Non-profit Partnership for the protection and rights management in the sphere of art "UPRAVIS

[dedulya37]

Сообщение от OlgaV

went to celebrate ...

You really, Kolya, there do not drink
Be patient until the house ... (V. Vysotsky)

[Самвел]

Сообщение от Firebird

But the life of any person, not just an artist, a taxi driver, the heir can deceive, but the fact she lives that would be practical and intelligent!

I decided to read UPRAVISA today, very interesting things written there, vobschem received a dose of the mind. But here, I conjecture that he meant Firebird, I want to learn from the Firebird, something she had in mind.

[Selene]

Сообщение от OlgaV

In many but not all - the rights of artists and their heirs for a long time remained "overboard". And it certainly needs to be corrected. And the idea UPRAVISA well within the practical problems of Part IV of the Civil Code (you know, the law will not work if you do not know how ...)
A criticism in advance, in my opinion, not correct, because the object of criticism may be the result. Let's see how it will be. For some reason it seems that such an organization as UPRAVIS will facilitated the development of civilized market of arts in Russia.
Everything! Congratulations! We went to celebrate ...

Dear Olga,
  A smack into several parts:
1. If anyone is interesting on this site in the summer has been published detailed articles on the law is followed. The article just raised including background on the right route, starting with the Berne Convention, Copyright Act (where the right to succeed was confirmed, albeit in another form) to the new part of the Civil Code, in accordance with the requirements and was accepted by RF Government Resolution of 19 April 2008 . N 285 "On approval of the right to pay remuneration to the author at the public resale of original works of fine art, author manuscripts (autographs) of literary and musical works."
Resolution of short, written fairly easily (if anyone would be interested)
2. This nonprofit organization is positioned the author of the post almost as an official representative of Rosokhrankultura (although was only akkreditetsiyu).
I suspect that the officials, which nods to the author, not as fools, as we reported here. On the violation of the antimonopoly legislation and that the FAS had already grabbed the little priest who forgets in authority, especially that FAS is at the peak of activity. In the fight against corruption established by competition authorities breaches of competition law (and in particular the granting of preferences among economic entities and /or cases of competition restriction) can be expensive in person to any official.
In addition, since the fall of top officials publicly banned almost beat the terrifying business. : D
Comment on the rest of what has been written by the post do not want lazy.

[dedulya37]

Сообщение от Selene

Comment on the rest of what has been written by the post do not want lazy.

By post, if not mistaken - Denis Lukashin, our Validating, director of the Art Consulting.

[Selene]

Сообщение от dedulya37

By post, if not mistaken - Denis Lukashin, our Validating, director of the Art Consulting.

Ok. Corrections. Thank you although he could and introduce themselves. We would then not so sharp ...

[Самвел]

Today, once again read UPRAVIS, thank Eugene for the repeated mention of the topic. That's what my question has arisen. for example, the owner of the collection, wants to promote the artist, and fixing some prices on the artist, hand over work to the auction, and redeem themselves, as this is a very common practice, one might say the essence of the auction, you will have to pay twice. Is it possible to somehow resolve the issue directly with UPRAVISOM, or the heirs, or a fraud on?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Samvel

you'll have to pay twice.

And you think someone in the Russian Federation is paying the heirs?

[Самвел]

Сообщение от "Cyril Syzransky

Do you think someone in the Russian Federation is paying the heirs?

Well now, can not pay, but then, after 10 years of commercials, all legal sales, they (the heirs) are entitled to require all full.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Samvel

but then, after 10 years of commercials, of all legal sales, they (the heirs) are entitled to require all full.

Retroactively?
The law is retroactive?

[Самвел]

Сообщение от "Cyril Syzransky

hindsight?
The law is retroactive?

 
since 2008, all sales must be paid, so mud is written here.
Bli you believe that we will live forever in the lawless country?