Alex Malik - artist

[amalic]

Dear Colleagues, very grateful for the interesting debate, the question is not idle, and date. And certainly every answer has its grain of truth. But, these feelings are very individual. The spirit of the city is not transmitted only by the school. Many have finished college and went out of its walls and abandoned all forgotten what to study. Yes, and the school itself - a living organism, which changes people and concepts. There is nothing immutable. ... and thank God otherwise it would be just boring. Artist largely to sing his own "song" only then it will be interesting to others ... I would like to know what you specifically is Odessa's spirit?

[ВЯЧЕСЛАВ]

Сообщение от amalic

I would like to know what you specifically is the spirit of Odessa?

First of shkole.V school boring to those who do not want to learn or if nekudyshnye uchitelya.Teper извените for quoting myself: ". ... what is "something elusive - that is the spirit of this city." Here you go along the street in an unfamiliar city, the lights came standard lamp in a window reflection of the pictures on the wall, slid down the shade - and remember my home .... And in painting as well as real life, everything is based on associations. That say to someone from Odessa artists associated with painting presented above work?

[amalic]

Association for each quite unique. And if they do not match, this indicates the difference of perception. In the work of A. Malik can find connections with the Odessa pictorial tradition (Even the fact that he taught at OGHU them. Grekova any one year, and knows the school is not hearsay). These relationships deeper and do not lie on the surface. School is just a start. More important to break away from those links, to find their own sound. Excuse me for edification ..

[LCR]

Here, look. Presumably, all these people saw themselves as artists in Paris. Most likely, none of them had studied at the Paris Graduate School of Fine Arts (this can be verified, but isklyucheiiya should not be many), but no one protests the fact that they were called

First Paris School:

Picasso, Chagall, Modigliani, Paskin, Soutine, Flint, Hmelyuk, Kisling, Kikoin, Fujita, Kirshenbaum, Marevna, Mel-Mutter, Tereshkovich and many others.

Second School of Paris:

Polyakov, Lanskoy, de Stael, Seifert, Hartung, Heifer, Jan, Pelayo, Pierrakos, Prasinos, Seiler, Senes, Vieira da Silva, Zao Wu-Ki (there are also French, thank God, I leave them blank, but you can see in section "Art Direction")

In my opinion, it depends not only on the art critics that detect stylistic similarities and defining the various schools and trends, but also on the willingness of the artist to define himself in any way, to emphasize its connection to some place with a certain style, etc. d.. The fact of birth or even the school itself is not significant.

[Артём]

Сообщение от LCR

I think it depends not only on the art critics that detect stylistic similarities and defining the various schools and trends, but also on the willingness of the artist to define himself in any way, to emphasize their connection with some a place with a certain style, and so on. The fact of birth or even the school does not in itself is significant.

      Normal artists write pictures and they do not have time and desire something to identify and to anything attached. This case art. Monet did not want to be impressionist, said that he was a realist. The name just stuck after painting "Impression".

[LCR]

Сообщение от Artem

Normal artists write pictures and they do not have time and desire something to identify and to anything attached. This case art. Monet did not want to be impressionist, said that he was a realist. The name just stuck after painting "Impression".

This is understandable, Artem. But Degas, for example, and Henri Rousseau are often signed "French artist, Debussy (whom I love very much) - Claude French, and this too is nothing wrong with that, is not it?

By the way, Mozart also defines itself as "Germany's musician, when it was profitable - not to mention Schumann and Wagner

[Tana]

Artem, LCR, agree with you, but here's looking at pictures of Malik, I can not say that they "Odessa", a work plan can be seen willows Kiev and Moscow, vobschem anywhere, have no their attachment to the city, to the place.
And, for example, Yegorov Yuri graduated Art Institute. Repin (Leningrad), then moved to Odessa, but his paintings, the sea, not in vain even say "Egorov sea!

[Артём]

Сообщение от LCR

Debussy (whom I love very much) - Claude French "

    Wrote a diploma in Debussy (boldel once) and still did not know about the signature. Thank you!

[ВЯЧЕСЛАВ]

Сообщение от LCR

By the way, Mozart also defines itself as "Germany's musician, when it was profitable - not to mention Schumann and Wagner

Thank LCR and Mozart - finally got to pervopritchiny - profitability . Yes, for some time cunning dealers "modern art" coined the designation "Odessa painting." What is it they do not really know but a set of names expect to sell more expensive and most glavnoe.Pust painting rests in this case - profit Above all.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 13 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Artem

I wrote a diploma in Debussy (boldel once) and still did not know about the signature. Thank you!

Serious seen the study, bOldenie preceded writing

[SAH]

Сообщение от VYACHESLAV

finally got to pervopritchiny - vygodnost.Da, for some time cunning dealers "modern art" coined the designation "Odessa painting." What is it they do not really know but it involves a set of names to sell at a higher price and most important thing.

Let me note that this site is and involves a "profitability". I am personally very fond of "Odessa painting, you could be my interpretation of what it is, and what the names of its components. Make a courtesy.