Konyunkturnost, success, conformism (verification dictionaries)

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Pavel

Painting on silk rather banal thing

Any technique can be considered a banal (depending on the context)

 
And in general, "banality" is not in the technique, but in my head!

[Pavel]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

Any technique can be regarded as banal (depending on the context)

 And in general, "banality" is not in the technique, but in my head!

Painting on silk was for aristocrats and engraving to Fight all the rest. Therefore, the first repeat, and print reflect the lives of ordinary people and how to reflect. so it became a favorite impressionists and the world, and zhivolis on silk remained Chinese and Japanese aristocrats and .=except Qi Baixo few people know so well. If you know you share.

[Annamain]

Сообщение от "Pavel

Talent is a gift, it can not adjust, learn, get with the genes. That talent elevate mundane to art. Spirituality is characteristic only talent is as the ability to fly. The rest is easy to deceive, this whole spirituality and so on is nonsense.
Painting on silk rather trivial thing, but the engraving, the figure in watercolor epics is yes!

Well, I leave you with your opinion about the talent, though in my opinion it is quite depressing. especially since many European talents based on clinical disorders of the brain.
I feel closer to the Chinese definition of evolution. Although the brightness of the expression of talent is best seen in congenital, in tune and harmony umnenie her stand, I think one of the important parts. Perhaps that is why the destructive talents of the patients I personally do not cool cute ... although, of course, the patient history is best roll was that sick.

With regard to the banality of painting on silk, with the same success could be called banal painting on canvas.

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Annamain

Well, I leave you with your opinion about the talent, though in my opinion it is quite depressing. especially since many European talents based on clinical disorders of the brain.
I feel closer to the Chinese definition of evolution. Although the brightness of the expression of talent is best seen in congenital, in tune and harmony umnenie her stand, I think one of the important parts. Perhaps that is why the destructive talents of the patients I personally do not cool cute ... although, of course, the patient history is best roll was that sick.

With regard to the banality of painting on silk, with the same success could be called banal painting on canvas.

Talent is a measure of oprederenie European silver-talent. In China, perhaps the other definitions, as a sick person will not be able not only to make a masterpiece or simply a work of art, but simply to draw something. I would like to know who you have in mind?

[Annamain]

Сообщение от Pavel

sick person will not be able not only to make a masterpiece or simply a work of art, but simply to draw something. I would like to know who you have in view?

For example, mental health VanGoga - it's not even a question. BBC showed a few films about the brain and the perception of the world as the vision of artists influenced by trauma physical, mental and other illnesses. There were about Monet to eye surgery and after, there is still different - it is necessary to clarify specifically by name. In general, almost certainly the ability to pulse splash of energy - an atypical thing. Therefore, artists are often prone to instability. Not too surprised if there were any studies of the brain, so they'd like to read. Since the formation of a neural processes are studied, there should be something very specific.

[dedulya37]

Сообщение от Annamain

how the vision of artists influenced by trauma physical, mental and other illnesses.

Сообщение от Annamain

need to clarify specifically by name.

The name of the previous post.

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Annamain

For example, mental health VanGoga - it's not even a question. BBC showed a few films about the brain and the perception of the world as the vision of artists influenced by trauma physical, mental and other illnesses. There were about Monet to eye surgery and after, there is still different - it is necessary to clarify specifically by name. In general, almost certainly the ability to pulse splash of energy - an atypical thing. Therefore, artists are often prone to instability. Not too surprised if there were any studies of the brain, so they'd like to read. Since the formation of a neural processes are studied, there should be something very specific.

Read the letters of Van Gogh. Could write so sick? Eyes - it's Professor disease and tsvetooschuschenie is the acuteness of perception, which, coupled with hard work and dedication determines capacity.
All that you have listed does not arise from the artist and the social conditions of its existence. Had Van Gogh good living, he would have remained an ordinary trader paintings firm Goupil, and Gauguin-broker, Manet and Matisse-trader-notary, etc. The artist must do something to prove to his destiny. The bigger the gift the more difficult artist. Some lucky. Ce la vie.
Actually, you should know more than the wretched BBC.

[L-ana64110]

FRENCH PRESS -
Published: Saturday 02 October 2010 - Last update: Saturday October 2, 2010

Le Monde: Emperor's New Clothes, or against the trader Art
Jaroslav Gorbanevskiy

"The Naked King" - that could be called art, which publishes the newspaper "Le Monde" and written by Jean Clair, an art historian, a member of the French Academy and a former director of the Picasso Museum. Jean Claire called his article "Against the trader of art."

Jeff Koons became the most expensive artists in the world - the author writes. This mutation has taken place during the transformations in the art market, which once governed the fine game between the leaders of galleries, on the one hand, and art connoisseur, on the other, but now has become a major engine of financial speculation in the range of two to three galleries, one auction house and a narrow public nouveaux riches. Koons chose the image of the freshly shaven trader with a diplomat in his hand, he is no different from his new audience, as if the degeneration has attributed to his ability to mimic.

Lack of painting or sculpture is - wrote many years director of the Picasso Museum - that they are not entertaining. Therefore, art is still not fall within the "festive" culture that our civilization is perfect. Thank God, arrived from Versailles, Takashi Murakami, the Louvre with the clowns and the Palazzo Grassi to Jeff Koons: Museums began to specialize on a combination of "low culture" and "high culture". It - pleasure opodleniya as Marcel Proust would say, snobbish punks, characteristic of decadent elites in the era of decadence. When a work of art becomes the object of financial fraud and glitters with gold, resulting from their stay in the salons of the Sun King, it has never tie oneself to the lowest function of human beings, by displaying the symbolic meanings that are suspected of art Dr. Freud.

From cult to culture, from culture to culture, from the cultural to the cult of money - we naturally have sunk to the level of an outhouse - writes the French Academy. Enumerating objects (actors?) Of contemporary art, where for polukorovoy in formol should self-portrait of his own frozen blood, and then all the more unpleasant anatomical details, the author states: humiliation, feces, skatologiya.

What's the point? Why society addresses this, so to speak, "Art" spring, while neither religion nor politics does not perform its structuring function. Is this skatologichesky disorder that spreads and sticks to bring that harmony, which we do not have enough?

The author recalls Poets 30-ies, who based their art on the voluptuous pleasure dirty and obscene, Sartre, who introduced the literary movement of viscous, sticky, spreads, devoid of form, and notes: to commit sacrilege, it was necessary to at least the presence of something holy .

The current form - it's infantile manifestation, but rather evidence of a return to something much more archaic. This illustrates the fact that Marcel Gaucher called the "total individual" - a person who believes that he has no responsibilities to society that as an artist, he has every right, and that person becomes "pervasive" and more "totalitarian" What once used to state, it comes through hallucination of the child, who imagine themselves omnipotent and imposed on the whole world their droppings ...
 
tags: Culture - Press Review

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от L-ana64110; 1305371]When a work of art becomes the object of financial fraud and glitters with gold, resulting from their stay in the salons of the Sun King, it has never tie oneself to the lowest function of human beings, by displaying the symbolic meanings that are suspected For Art Dr. Freud.[/QUOTE]
Yes

Yes Yes
[QUOTE="L-ana64110; 1305371

it comes through hallucination of the child, who imagine themselves omnipotent and imposed on the whole world their excrement ...

Dadado

Сообщение от "L-ana64110

This is - fun opodleniya as Marcel Proust would say, snobbish punks, characteristic of decadent elites in the era of decadence

DaDaDaDa

[Posav]

Dadado

Meanwhile, in the cited paper Tar Lenin wrote:

"... Live in society and be free from society is impossible. Freedom of bourgeois writer, artist, actress is merely a disguised (or hypocritically masked) the dependence on the money bag from the giving of the content ... And we, the Socialists, exposing the hypocrisy , tear away the false signs - not to get a non-class literature and art (it would be possible only in a socialist society, non-class), but to hypocrisy-free, but in fact associated with the bourgeoisie, Literature oppose a genuinely free, open related with the proletariat literature. This will be a free literature, because it is not self-interest and not a career, and the idea of socialism and sympathy for the workers will recruit more and more forces to its ranks.
       This will be a free literature, because it will serve not satiated heroine, not bored and suffering from obesity, "the upper ten thousand" and the millions and tens of millions of workers who form the cream of the country, its strength and its future. This will be a free literature, fertilizing the last word of the revolutionary ideas of humanity and the living experience of the work of the socialist proletariat, creates a constant interaction between the experience of the past (scientific socialism, to finalize the development of socialism from its primitive, utopian forms) and the experience of this (real fight fellow workers). "