Artist Alexey Golovin

[Алексей Головин]

Igor Guriev,
My teacher A. Mylnikov said that there is nothing worse than indifference.
I am glad that you did not stay indifferent to my work, comment and are not passed.
What makes you think that I have no self-irony? We're with you not familiar ... and judge the artist's self-irony
one or the other picture, where the author himself portrayed stupid.
Yes, and severe or gay, who cares?

Artem,
You talk about the difference between compositional pattern.
the spatial make breakthroughs. For me it is important that if nothing is not a minor distraction
the viewer from the main in the picture.
This rigidity of composite construction has long sought making composite searches.
Another artist will do differently, knowing kopozitsiyu on his own and is seeking other
results.

Yurko,
Envy ... the notion of a separate topic. Repeatedly experiencing unpleasant
moments in life because of envy of others. But it's not scary ...
Thank you for your kind words and wishes, I am glad that you left your feedback.

fabosch,
 I can not judge who it is addressed to my work. The masses or the masses.
I agree that the masses have always been indifferent to art.
When I'm working on a painting I write for myself and not think for a mass audience, I'm doing it.

In the last post I wrote that I was against the prevalence tekstovok over the image that
is the dominant factor in contemporary art.
The artist, of course, he could write about what he thought and that experienced at the time of creation
of a product if feels this urge.

As for still lifes placed you in this topic, they leave me completely indifferent.

[Fed]

Objectives should be set not regress, but outstanding, for example - to overcome the old masters. It's definitely more interesting than the controversial (thought as neutrally describe the work of another graduate of the Academy, but not invented) murk.
Themselves to see what you would have chosen something or this:

[Алексей Головин]

[Алексей Головин]

[Тютчев]

[I-V]

[Тютчев]

[Игорь Гурьев]

Chepik also said that his teacher Andrei Andreyevich Mylnikov.

Here you do not know whether to laugh or cry.
Maybe you're at it, and hoped, when did this black gaping failure between the two bodies?

I assure you that all the other classicists this badly things would not have done.

The picture just breaks up, you know?

Even worse, much worse than the bullfighters Mylnikov ...

I'm not talking about the alleged plaster drapery, painted some reason red svyaschennago Soviet banner.

[Fed]

I assure you that all the other classicists this badly things would not have done.
The picture just breaks up, you know?
I'm not talking about the alleged plaster drapery, painted some reason red svyaschennago Soviet banner.
[/QUOTE]
  As I understand it, the red drapery, a tribute to Caravaggio.
The fact that 2-e figures separated was even fortunate - like Amazon is already the world (right) side does not belong, that is has finished her Achilles. In the spirit of Russian iconography.
  Ie such Hyperrealism late Middle Ages.
  But to pose and have a little pretentious for sale.

 Challenge is not enough.

Note from Caravaggio and still life (building 2) is not particularly prilizany, hyper-natural.

[Артём]

[QUOTE=\\