|
|||||||
| Costs, valuation, attribution Discuss artworks’ prices and attribution. |
![]() |
|
|
Опции темы | Опции просмотра |
|
|
Язык оригинала: Русский #41 |
|
Бывалый
Регистрация: 23.10.2008
Сообщений: 359
Спасибо: 108
Поблагодарили 326 раз(а) в 113 сообщениях
Репутация: 904
|
And not only collectors, but that is typical, and dealers, too. The collector is responsible only to itself, on the basis of his eye - smotrok, or so favorite auctioneers "caveat emptor". The dealer is responsible to the client, especially its reputation, and, of course, money. Maybe for someone really is not a question of principle, a picture of in 1950 or in 2008 (agree, that is, to put it mildly, strange), just to work like it ... But, in my opinion, this situation is possible only in the event that the case of very inexpensive things, but when you pay for work of art, which is viewed as more than aesthetically pleasing object, of course desirable to have as much information.
|
|
|
|
| Эти 4 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо Прохожий за это полезное сообщение: |
|
|
Язык оригинала: Русский #42 | |
|
Гуру
|
Цитата:
Where are much better? |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Похожие темы
|
||||
| Тема | Автор | Разделы | Ответов | Последние сообщения |
| Question on Nemukhin | Сергеич | Investing in Art | 10 | 23.10.2009 12:49 |
| The question of attribution and evaluation of pictures | slavan | Costs, valuation, attribution | 9 | 06.02.2009 21:01 |
| Linguistic question | LCR | Chatter | 12 | 12.01.2009 13:35 |
| Recession: the remarkable works of art at low prices | Евгений | Chatter | 1 | 06.11.2008 16:08 |
| Picture Frames | Сталевар | Restoration | 2 | 05.09.2008 07:50 |
|
|