Go Back   Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство > English forum > Costs, valuation, attribution
 English | Русский Forum ARTinvestment.RU RSS Register Blogs FAQ Community Today's Posts Search

Costs, valuation, attribution Discuss artworks’ prices and attribution.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-06-2010, 20:48 Original language: Russian        #1
Гуру
 
sergejnowo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Гамбург
Posts: 3,845
Thanks: 3,565
Thanked 4,959 Times in 1,455 Posts
Reputation: 9306
Default Develop Please doubts

Today, one of the auctions in Germany, was sold to the work of Fedor Andreevich Bronnikov (1827-1902).
Oil on canvas, 88 x 113,5 cm
Care, taking into account the commission about 100.000 euros.
The work did not overlap, canvas, frame and frame homes (from a phone call from iskustvovedom auction)
Note the last photo, photograph the back side.
In my eyes, the material well, not as not up to 130 years .
Judge please.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	img.php.jpg
Views:	494
Size:	382.3 KB
ID:	837412   Click image for larger version

Name:	1846_b.jpg
Views:	399
Size:	279.0 KB
ID:	837422   Click image for larger version

Name:	1846_a (1).jpg
Views:	431
Size:	215.1 KB
ID:	837432   Click image for larger version

Name:	1846_a.jpg
Views:	482
Size:	186.9 KB
ID:	837442  



sergejnowo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2010, 21:08 Original language: Russian        #2
Гуру
 
Veronic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Украина Мукачево, Венгрия Хевиз
Posts: 2,165
Thanks: 1,793
Thanked 1,718 Times in 574 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Reputation: 2879
Send a message via Skype™ to Veronic
Default

Robot in the whole course, elegant, but it seems to me that the hand is disproportionately small.
A general frame and canvas may well survive if there was no temperature difference



Veronic is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Veronic For This Useful Post:
NATA NOVA (12-06-2010), sergejnowo (12-06-2010)
Old 12-06-2010, 21:18 Original language: Russian        #3
Гуру
 
Кирилл Сызранский's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: РФ, Самара
Posts: 75,437
Thanks: 27,871
Thanked 55,336 Times in 24,288 Posts
Blog Entries: 126
Reputation: 102396
Send a message via Skype™ to Кирилл Сызранский
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Veronic View Post
but it seems to me that the hand is disproportionately small.
What: Left or right hand on his stomach on the child's head?



Кирилл Сызранский is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2010, 21:20 Original language: Russian        #4
Гуру
 
Veronic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Украина Мукачево, Венгрия Хевиз
Posts: 2,165
Thanks: 1,793
Thanked 1,718 Times in 574 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Reputation: 2879
Send a message via Skype™ to Veronic
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyril Syzranskiy View Post
left on his stomach
yes, she said.



Veronic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2010, 21:25 Original language: Russian        #5
Гуру
 
sergejnowo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Гамбург
Posts: 3,845
Thanks: 3,565
Thanked 4,959 Times in 1,455 Posts
Reputation: 9306
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Veronic View Post
yes, it.
hand, too, have ...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	1846_b (1).jpg
Views:	361
Size:	378.5 KB
ID:	837542  



sergejnowo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sergejnowo For This Useful Post:
NATA NOVA (12-06-2010)
Old 12-06-2010, 21:27 Original language: Russian        #6
Гуру
 
Кирилл Сызранский's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: РФ, Самара
Posts: 75,437
Thanks: 27,871
Thanked 55,336 Times in 24,288 Posts
Blog Entries: 126
Reputation: 102396
Send a message via Skype™ to Кирилл Сызранский
Default

Veronic, compare with the hand on this work:
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Покинутая. 1873.jpg
Views:	405
Size:	134.5 KB
ID:	837582  



Кирилл Сызранский is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Кирилл Сызранский For This Useful Post:
I-V (22-11-2010), NATA NOVA (12-06-2010), Veronic (12-06-2010), Артём (23-11-2010), Вивьен (13-06-2010), Мимопроходил (14-06-2010)
Old 12-06-2010, 21:30 Original language: Russian        #7
Бывалый
 
Любознательный's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 301
Thanks: 470
Thanked 326 Times in 132 Posts
Reputation: 653
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sergejnowo View Post
is not duplication, canvas, frame and frame homes (from a phone call from iskustvovedom auction)
In this photo: frame - not native. At 100%.
Drip from the top of the frame reached its bottom and canvas are not affected.
Photographed frame can own only when one single condition - the abolition of the Newton's second law.



Любознательный is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Любознательный For This Useful Post:
NATA NOVA (12-06-2010)
Old 12-06-2010, 21:31 Original language: Russian        #8
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I think I see traces of paper, which was sealed around the perimeter of the back of the frame. If so, it protected the back of the picture of the impact of external factors. The dust may not penetrate the front or the back side. Himself a frame (if it is pine) has acquired a natural reddish tint. And all of equal importance is the conservation factor (constant relative humidity and temperature), and the degree of care for the picture. Those who have spent today 100 thousand euros, I think, were able to verify the authenticity of the paintings and, accordingly, its age.
For more conclusive findings would have to watch the stretcher and canvas in hand.




Last edited by OlegTsi; 12-06-2010 at 22:00.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to For This Useful Post:
SAH (12-06-2010), sergejnowo (12-06-2010), usynin2 (23-11-2010), Вивьен (13-06-2010), Кирилл Сызранский (12-06-2010), Любознательный (12-06-2010)
Old 12-06-2010, 21:33 Original language: Russian        #9
Гуру
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,558
Thanks: 923
Thanked 220 Times in 172 Posts
Reputation: 412
Default

sergejnowo, now this canvas + -70-80 years, you can compare too good conservation.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	P1010235.jpg
Views:	327
Size:	406.6 KB
ID:	837602   Click image for larger version

Name:	P1010236.jpg
Views:	285
Size:	391.8 KB
ID:	837612  



artman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2010, 21:34 Original language: Russian        #10
Гуру
 
Кирилл Сызранский's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: РФ, Самара
Posts: 75,437
Thanks: 27,871
Thanked 55,336 Times in 24,288 Posts
Blog Entries: 126
Reputation: 102396
Send a message via Skype™ to Кирилл Сызранский
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OlegTsi View Post
I think I see traces of paper, which was sealed around the perimeter of the back of the frame.
Oh! This is meogoe explains.
And even such a "lifting of Newton's Second Law".
Quote:
Originally Posted by inquisitive View Post
According to this photo: frame - not my own. At 100%.
Drip from the top of the frame reached its bottom and canvas are not affected.
Photographed frame can own only when one single condition - the abolition of the Newton's second law.



Кирилл Сызранский is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Attributed, doubts Dogel Costs, valuation, attribution 1 17-03-2010 13:22
Is it possible to create and develop the art market without kommodifikatsii art? AlexanderG Investing in Art 369 24-02-2010 19:15





All times are GMT +3. The time now is 22:52.
Telegram - Contact Us - Обработка персональных данных - Archive - Top


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.