Babble wins or creates evil?

[lyagushatnik]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

lyagushatnik, in the first place: Someone Bablo (and to whom - Money is)
I personally money is very kind I love and respect.

Examples of in-studio!
In Catherine Belokur anyone and do not remember ..
Pirosmani ....

Van Gogh died in poverty - at once remembered and typed a query in a search engine and that's interesting given:

Why did Van Gogh died in poverty, and Picasso left a rich legacy? C of this question started a master-class ...

At the end of the conversation found the answer myself: Van Gogh created "to himself," and Picasso's needs contemporaries and painted pictures that were in demand and in high demand among the population. According to statistics, in the world of gifted people is four times more than the talented marketers.

Lots of examples!

Think of Cervantes, who was in jail several years for debt, except in captivity by the Moors served, although at the very end of life and found a wealthy patron, who provided him a dignified old age, but this is unlikely to greatly affect the fate of Don Quixote.

But I do not oppose the money in the art (for example, is impossible without them entirely architecture), I just put the question that today, in the end wins.