Babble wins or creates evil?

[NATA NOVA]

Originally Posted by Sim

NATA NOVA, after the theme of Sotheby's, I shudder from the word "Lord". MB You would say "gentleman"?

About "Lord" fingers vivihnesh .... How about dzhentlbmena ..

[Сима]

Originally Posted by Cyril Syzranskiy

Sima, and that" gentleman "to hear a stupid advice not to say that this board stupid?

I think Cyril. that in the circumstances.

[K-Maler]

Originally Posted by Posav

We really like to discuss about the role of money in the arts,

In fact, there are good and evil is evil or good media. They are living creatures. Money is just a tool that helps or one or the other. Ie result depends on whose hands they are.

[Buscador]

Actually, the money makes life easier. Until then, until becoming its main meaning ... True, we sadly have to admit that they are in large numbers and for the most part all the time do not accrue to those "And the people in the arts are no different from other citizens ...

Added after 2 minutes

Originally Posted by lyagushatnik

But I can not think that the forums be sure to specify the age of the interlocutor.

- You are a born?
- On what date or what the fuck? ..
<!--~ A ~-->

[lyagushatnik]

Originally Posted by Buscador

- You are a born?
- On what date or what the fuck? ..
<!--~ A ~--><!--~ 6 7 ~--><!--~ ~-->

<!--~ A ~-->
remember

Added after 16 minutes

Originally Posted by Cyril Syzranskiy

Photo by avatar made in October, "fresh".


Just think a bit, if man can paint (even if it sells) do not read this thing Gogol?

Posted 55 seconds

In order not to give stupid advice, for example. A?

1. Honestly, for her I would not tell you that you are 50 years old. Very young face.

2. Well, now so little read classics that anything can happen. So I did not think. Read that artists Gogol or not. I here once met a linguist who did not know that there is a product of "The Gadfly".

3. What a stupid piece of advice? I do not give you any advice. That you are putting yourself in a stupid position, changing the direction of discussions and an emphasis on what is not clear.
First, I asked:

1) "Has anyone read Portrait Gogol? Think that work in the subject." - Ie not addressed personally to you and to all participants to add to the topic another look at the question.

2) You do not understand why suddenly replied:
"Portrait of Gogol's" must read ... the more! " - I think many, like me, you do not know (and in the profile is hardly written about it) would think of this answer that you have not read Portrait. And then I think, nothing serious, I had only a year ago, read this piece.

3) Next, I wrote on logic, without any irony or desire to offend you:
"Portrait of Gogol sure to read!
I even would have been interesting if given their opinion on this product. "

I do not understand you. Sorry.

[Konstantin]

You do not understand why suddenly replied:
"Portrait of Gogol's" must read ... the more! " - I think many, like me, you do not know (and in the profile is hardly written about it) would think of this answer that you have not read Portrait. And then I think, nothing serious, I had only a year ago, read this work.

I read a year ago ... So at 28 years old. In my time, "Portrait of Gogol was in school curriculum. It turns out no.