Art totalitarian

[nikola]

Сообщение от fross

And then I wrote about the fragility of art, and the fact that his fate could be quite different.

XXVII CPSU Congress stressed that the main task of its cultural policy, the Party sees that the widest scope for the creative abilities of people to make their life spiritually rich, multifaceted.
The Soviet people expect from artists artistic innovation, inspiration and a bright uncover the truth of life today. The novelty, the magnitude and complexity of the challenges facing the country, but also the increase in the modern world ideological struggle requires from each artist and an architect of intolerance to current perceptions are manifestations of the ideological promiscuity, melkotemya, middle-class constraints.

[Glasha]

Сообщение от sss

shall make a reservation that I am omnivorous, not divide artists to socialist realists, nonconformists, landscape and marine painters, dark and cheerful, and I divide them in the art and artists. Can not afford to admire and chairman of the kolkhoz ", if it catches, not to mention landscapes and still lifes ...

There is! Found the golden words! sss Thank you!
Here I am in a notice that guzzler, but this is because life position is this: tolerance, openness to the arts, freedom of perception (of the classifications, opinions, prices ..- it all again)
Can such an attitude on the art market would be more adequate?

I'm reading now and do not quite understand what the dispute, exactly?
And much who where will be (in the "slice of world culture"), and that will be poche m,
so that's for sure
"We can not predict ..."

[artcol]

Сообщение от Gala

Here! Found the golden words! sss Thank you!
Here I am in a notice that guzzler, but this is because life position is this: tolerance, openness to the arts, freedom of perception (of the classifications, opinions, prices ..- it all again)
Can such an attitude on the art market would be more adequate?

I'm reading now and do not quite understand what the dispute itself?

Sergei like klass.russkaya like painting, as he calls it socialist realism, and reinforces their tastes (quite normal - I agree, many such like) a reference to the title and all other attributes of well-deserved, given to th first of all in achieving goals and objectives Party (different in different years). And it should be all spread out - and disputes will be no tastes.

[Tana]

Oh, could not stand it, touched ....

1. Eugene I think in relation to the artists' Jack of Diamonds "You're wrong.
From his own observations:
When in London earlier this year, the exhibition "From Russia with Love", a few weeks had to book tickets, people-flow, among them Russian-unit flows British, but the exhibition was a room with the French Impressionists, but ... . do not push, we had to wait to get a better and closer to see (I quote LCR) "these monstrous still lifes with bold, widely ramified, vulgar Soviet-bubnovovaletovskoy lilacs пейзажики written by people, as if not unaware of what was happening in the world of art since the mid XIX century. "
I personally saw how enthusiastic about the British looked at the pictures Larinonova, Falk, Udaltsova, Goncharova, Mashkov, Bakst, and before the works of Malevich, sighing "is simply divine! As vividly discussed what was delighted to come to the exhibition several times and sorry that the exhibition is so long.

2. SergeiSK but agree, even by academics, social realism technique is much higher than any nonconformists. So class painting above!
Just not often heard phrase in the British Galleries, which is among the Soviet artists is very high level of painting and of modern Russian artists, "Yes, this is not something that's your Soviet education was much better."

[fross]

Сообщение от Tana

I personally saw how enthusiastic about the British looking at pictures Larinonova, Falk, Udaltsova, Goncharova, Mashkova, Bakst, and before the works of Malevich, sighing "is simply divine! As vividly discussed what was delighted to come to the exhibition a few times and regretted that the exhibition is so long.
Just not often heard phrase in the British Galleries, which is among the Soviet artists is very high level of painting and of modern Russian artists, "Yes, this is not something that's your Soviet education was much better".

And who among these was the Soviet education? Can you forget someone? Who is this remarkable exhibition presents Socialist Realism?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Tana

I personally saw how enthusiastic about the British looking at pictures Larinonova, Falk, Udaltsova, Goncharova, Mashkova, Bakst, and before the works of Malevich, sighing "is simply divine!!,

This is a list of what you have? This is the socialist realism that it?
Larionov, Goncharova, with all of the Council of Deputies of the day did not live with 915-first lived in France, and Falk in the 38-m back, and in 58-m already dead.
About Bakst not to mention ...

[Glasha]

Сообщение от LCR

I'm probably going to hang in your home any nalbandyanovskoggo Lenin than the same flowers,

Liana ?!))))... .. Know how strongly and figuratively! ... Even hypothetically - the creeps!

[Tana]

Cyril Syzransky, fross
Edit your last post, I think now would be more clear, my previous message:
1.otvet both belong to the "vulgar Soviet-bubnovovaletovskoy lilacs ...."
2.Mnenie, which is not often heard abroad about the level of art in the Soviet era.

[fross]

Сообщение от Tana

Cyril Syzransky, fross
Edit your last post, I think now would be more clear, my previous message:
1.otvet both belong to the "vulgar Soviet-bubnovovaletovskoy lilacs ...."
2.Mnenie, which is not often heard abroad about the level of art in the Soviet period.

Then, please remind me in whose performance in the exhibition hung work, on whose account you perceived description of "vulgar Soviet-bubnovovaletovskaya lilacs?

[LCR]

Сообщение от Tana

  (Quote LCR) "this monstrous still lifes with bold, widely ramified, vulgar Soviet-bubnovovaletovskoy lilacs пейзажики written by people, as if unaware of what was happening in the world of art since the mid XIX century. "
I personally saw how enthusiastic about the British looked at the pictures Larinonova, Falk, Udaltsova, Goncharova, Mashkov, Bakst, and before the works of Malevich, sighing "is simply divine! As vividly discussed what was delighted to come to the exhibition several times and sorry that the exhibition is so short.

You know, my dear Tana, since you have given me this honor, I would still like to see the meaning of what I have not distorted. So I'll have to quote itself:

Сообщение от LCR

I do not like the Jack of Diamonds, but frankly, my hurtful words were not directed against members of the group, but against their epigones, adepts of the so-called "Russian sezannizma" - a terrible thing, this Russian sezannizm

I do not know what Udaltsova, Goncharova, and Malevich Takst were members of the "Jack of Diamonds", correctly said that learning at any age is too late. Thanks for the information.