Art totalitarian

[LCR]

Сообщение от SergeiSK

Here! That's our Socialist Realism also has the features characteristic of the art of that time! And art is not in the individual countries, and in the world, as the trend of that era. And this trend continued until the end of 1960. So the most rabid Socialist Realism to the period 1930-60 GG And I stress - as the direction of world art. Only in the West it is called differently, but the term "socialist realism" is ours, homegrown. In the West, this trend ended with the advent of Andy Warhol, as we have with the advent of Gorbachev ... Logically, Russia can not understand ..

I think so, not true. These general features of reality emerged in the late 20's. But embraced by (I apologize for the wording of the military, but in this case it is not fully lischena sense) especially in countries with a totalitarian regime - Germany, Italy, USSR.
In France or the United States, for example, they used far less systematic.

You erase wrongly in my view such wonderful phenomena as the second school of Paris in France and abstract expressionism in the United States - if we talk about changing trends in the U.S., it seems to me the name of Pollock's much more appropriate than the name Warhol. One could even say the emergence of national art, but can not ignore such an immense figure, as Hopper, in any case no doubt that the withdrawal of American artists from the United States associated with abstract expressionism.

Then, this "militarized" version of social realism makes me much less protest than its "peaceful" version, which I have expressed above, that is, to paraphrase you, then I would rather hang at home any nalbandyanovskoggo Lenin than its same flowers, but fortunately, this dilemma Hamlet purely theoretical - I have the house all the walls are covered with Roginsky, and it suited me just fine