Photography as an object of investment

[Черномашенцев Владимир]

Сообщение от KaterinaMN

....
but, my friends, before we talk about investments in this photo, you must at least agree on terms. ...

... And let's not generalize ....

at least that is discussed digital photography and how it is discussed - not too shows a deep understanding of contemporary photography and a certain tendency to generalize ...

... Vladimir, to be honest - you are at all difficult to understand ...

.... Do not call modern art digital photo - she is different ....

I highlighted phrases from your letter, which can easily accept. But first of all please do not take my words about the "blonde with expensive cameras, personal to him. I just gave an example of some modern "photographers." Such heroes are now complete and in painting, and photo. Please do not generalize.

When I wrote about the unreasonableness of investment in modern photographers, it was referring to investments in digital photography. Alas, to predict the circulation in this case is simply not possible due to easy copying. Photo-artist himself may over time see the new media better than before, new opportunities in print - and make a new mark. In addition, the level of talent works in general, small (ka ki in painting, not more 5-10%). Or do you think that the work presented on page 10 might be interesting in investitsionnoi sense?

Your story about the technique at least a matter of respect. I may not be ready to use antique cameras, but in any case, "Respect." It's like with cars. It is impossible to persuade motorists to transfer to a motorcycle or scooter, despite the terrible traffic jams in Moscow. I have my friends and not carried away by their example. They do not understand any comfort scooter, nor its high price, comparable to the car. But another friend of mine can travel to Moscow 50 km. cycling. And here is I do not understand his passion: the comfort and safety of bike does not suit me, as the price compared to the price of a bike. But just as he looks at my scooter.
Moral of the story: "Do not generalize!"

We found it difficult to understand each other, because until the dispute with me you do not show on this subject his work and was not told about her technique. I could easily have you confused with the "blonde with Photo courses. But watching your black and white images I see that you are working quite well with the light and shadow. Your work does not cause problems, as examples of some other forumistov. My only complaint sovereshenno biased: many photographers shoot h \\ b, since no color to work in many ways easier. Appears some significance even in the ordinary frames. But this is my bias works.