Curious portrait Bukowskis in Stockholm

[Кирилл Сызранский]

By date.
I realized that the auction calls "the 1800th year." Ie our-XIX century.

[Eriksson]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

According to date.
I realized that the auction calls "the 1800th year." Ie our in-XIX.

Swedes "1800" - is a 18 century, ie from 1701 to 1799 years. In the catalog to describe the picture is "Year 1700-1800"

[Кирилл Сызранский]

You ought to know, you-Ericsson.

[Eriksson]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

You know better, you-Ericsson.

Yeah! I live here read it 20 years ...: rolleyes:

[SAH]

Why is this picture of Russian?

[Eriksson]

So it is written. I think they do not take from the ceiling ...

[Wladzislaw]

At Anna Ioannovna somewhat similar.

[Самвел]

I think they will wait for this issue, and probably come up with for this monstrous bike.

[Eriksson]

Сообщение от Wladzislaw

At Anna Ioannovna little similar.

Well, finally!
Thanks, Vlad!
I told him.
I have this idea also came to mind. Immediately write mail charge of Russian art at the Superintendent Bukovskis, her name is Erica Fryukstrem. The answer was this: "resemblance to Anna Romanov clear, our experts have a lot of discussions and divergent views, who can be the author of the picture. In addition, documentary evidence, who is depicted in the portrait is not, and therefore it is -" Portrait of a Woman, unknown Russian artist "and so on.."
Nothing more has not been attained.

So, gentlemen, good! The question is:
Who could write Anna Ioannovna?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Eriksson

Who could write Anna Ioannovna?

Could? Anybody visiting from Western artists, for example.
But writing exactly Louis Caravaque. His disciples could, I. Vishnyakov, for example.
But the portrait of the Empress on her head must be something.
Yes, and manner of writing submitted to the portrait of late, not Lane. floor. 18 th century.