Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство

Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/index.php)
-   Exhibitions and events (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/forumdisplay.php?f=86)
-   -   Curious portrait Bukowskis in Stockholm (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=9226)

Eriksson 15.11.2008 22:05

Curious portrait Bukowskis in Stockholm
 
Вложений: 7
Dear Sirs
I understand that many of you - professional isskustvovedy and collectors. Read Your forum is nothing but sheer pleasure - how nice that is gathered literate, intelligent people do not use the word "afftor" (Fu, as many wince!). Notes on the forum - just a real school for the novice collector, despite the fact that often you go to the "mezhdusoboychik" which, of course, is not strange among acquaintances.

I have here a question. In the autumn auctions "Bukowskis" in Stockholm may be a very interesting portrait. The picture is described as "portrait of a woman, an unknown Russian artist, 17-18 centuries".

I'm having some thoughts about this film, but before they have to share, I would like to know professionally mnenie.Obraschatsya on "Gelos" do not want to - from them except the Soviet-type personal boorishness not wait for.

At the auction site that is where the portrait is given the highest number of large fragments, as many as 7 pieces in a row - on any picture is no longer checked. Somehow, these Swedes were guided, probably. Do you think?
Auctions number 1161.
http://bukowskis.se/cgi-bin/show.cgi...amp;session =#
Thank you in advance for any response!

Кирилл Сызранский 15.11.2008 22:14

By date.
I realized that the auction calls "the 1800th year." Ie our-XIX century.

Eriksson 15.11.2008 22:19

Цитата:

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky (Сообщение 105756)
According to date.
I realized that the auction calls "the 1800th year." Ie our in-XIX.

Swedes "1800" - is a 18 century, ie from 1701 to 1799 years. In the catalog to describe the picture is "Year 1700-1800"

Кирилл Сызранский 15.11.2008 22:25

You ought to know, you-Ericsson.

Eriksson 15.11.2008 22:31

Цитата:

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky (Сообщение 105776)
You know better, you-Ericsson.

Yeah! I live here read it 20 years ...: rolleyes:

SAH 15.11.2008 22:32

Why is this picture of Russian?

Eriksson 15.11.2008 22:38

So it is written. I think they do not take from the ceiling ...

Wladzislaw 15.11.2008 23:07

At Anna Ioannovna somewhat similar.

Самвел 15.11.2008 23:17

I think they will wait for this issue, and probably come up with for this monstrous bike.

Eriksson 15.11.2008 23:24

Цитата:

Сообщение от Wladzislaw (Сообщение 105846)
At Anna Ioannovna little similar.

Well, finally!
Thanks, Vlad!
I told him.
I have this idea also came to mind. Immediately write mail charge of Russian art at the Superintendent Bukovskis, her name is Erica Fryukstrem. The answer was this: "resemblance to Anna Romanov clear, our experts have a lot of discussions and divergent views, who can be the author of the picture. In addition, documentary evidence, who is depicted in the portrait is not, and therefore it is -" Portrait of a Woman, unknown Russian artist "and so on.."
Nothing more has not been attained.

So, gentlemen, good! The question is:
Who could write Anna Ioannovna?


Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 00:49.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Перевод: zCarot