Photo: Exhibition of nominees "Kandinsky Prize-2008"

[artcol]

Once again, all looked ... Is that - Prize nominees? According to contemporary art? Name Kandinsky? Ha-ha: D: D: D
Or I got it wrong?

[Евгений]

Originally Posted by artcol

Or I got it wrong?

I guess you're right, do not understand ....

[Vladimir]

Originally Posted by Eugene

Dmitry Vrubel and Victoria Timofeeva

I for some reason, this project reminds perestroika Glazunov: both form and promise. There is no such feelings?

[artcol]

Originally Posted by Vladimir

For some reason I like this project perestroika Glazunov: both form and promise. There is no such feelings?

It is difficult to say ... Here is read http://www.kandinsky-prize.ru/o-premii

Flown, hurry - buy untwisted!

Shl Laura Saatchi haunt yet one more "effective manager".

[fross]

Originally Posted by Ilona

ABOUT terms.
"Modern" and current "do not contradict each other. Actual always contemporary, and others can not. And the modern means its only a temporary membership and is not necessarily relevant to the content. Therefore, in my opinion, the joint use of the word" contemporary relevance Art fully and accurately defines the phenomenon, but you can just say "actual art".

I am not an art critic, and absolutely no objection to me, "preached." So please explain to me that is is relevant, and it can not be modern. A combined contemporary relevance is the emphasis on modern, as is modern and irrelevant?

[artcol]

Originally Posted by fross

is not an art critic, and absolutely no objection to me, "preached." So please explain to me that is is relevant, and it can not be modern. A combined contemporary relevance is the emphasis on modern, as is relevant and not necessarily present?

News - a characteristic of the nature of this art. Modern - this is a temporary description, the art has no relation.

News - transient. Today one - another tomorrow. Conveyor, transport theory and practice of consumer markets in the sphere of art.

[LCR]

Originally Posted by fross

is not an art critic, and absolutely no objection to me, "preached." So please explain to me that is is relevant, and it can not be modern. A combined contemporary relevance is the emphasis on modern, as is modern and irrelevant?

Generally these terms are not quite simple, at least for me.

In principle, "Contemporary Art" really often referred to as part of contemporary art, with certain characteristics, of which home in my opinion - this is intentional (or presented as such) the lack of aesthetic criteria. To clarify: Hirst, Koons, Cattelan - the actual art, and say, Freud, Hockney and Richter - just modern. That is modern really is irrelevant, but the actual unmodern seemingly no
The confusion I think contributes to the fact that the Russian language is difficult to translate the French term "art moderne" (not to be confused with modernism or - it's me on purpose to amuse you, Ilona - "Art Nouveau"!), Which can also be translated as "contemporary art" and which is used to denote the art between the two warrior, somewhere before the 50-ies.

[artcol]

Originally Posted by LCR

That is modern really is irrelevant, but the actual unmodern seemingly no

Well, what about Duchamp? And what is modern and what is not?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Originally Posted by Ilona

I do photos, so you Tell A about some event that a site on which I work was interesting, so that together we can discuss the exhibition, paintings, artists.

Photo you are doing well and, in my opinion, it is more important than to understand the difference between "modern" and "actual" or other such insignificant trivialities.

[LCR]

Originally Posted by artcol

Well, what about Duchamp? And what is modern and what is already there?

After all, Duchamp topical hudolzhnikom no one calls it - as if this John the Baptist)))

As for what is considered modern, the difference between "l'art moderne" and "l'art contemporain", of course, quite conventional. In English uporteblyaetsya identical terminology - "modern art" and "contemporary art", just look at the composition of the bidding in the auction houses, to feel that the demarcation line runs in the 50's and 60 years.