Paintings and prints

[Борис Кон]

Сообщение от kr555

Here the painting from the collection musée Condé

Millésime création /exécution
1699 entre; 1706 et

thanks of course, but I'm on his engraving of her dating !
you were pleased to say that she was not 17 and the early 18th century reprint son

[kr555]

Boris Con, well, read carefully.

"A copy of which Jean-Francois did with the original father"

where does your engraving, talking about the picture.

[Борис Кон]

sorry, I'm not about as they say - who 's a lousy than Ban .

By the way, about the bath !
then I just now banned on one resource , modederator from any there Ekaterinoslavl chtoli. I they put a "Seller sweets ", and
This connoisseur of fine banned me from ignorance , explaining - saying that I cut out pictures from magazines, and then trying to sell them expensive .... ! passing them , as he writes, otbratite attention (! ) for "ANCIENT ENGRAVINGS ! very expression is worth

What about " Constantine" .
Thank you all for participating, for - enlightenment.

[Fed]

Interestingly, some topics have a lively discussion.

Mouse generates an elephant.

Foreign prints, sells for 100 - 200 Euro trigger more discussions than interesting Russian icons like these http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=169871

Mystery.

[redbor]

Сообщение от Boris Cohn ; 2260021"

but I'm on his engraving of her dating !
you were pleased to say that she was not 17 and the early 18th century reprint son

Well, of course : Francois de Troy painted a portrait of comedian (portrait no longer exists) ,
 Cornelis Vermeulen on this portrait in 1694 he built an engraving
 and in the early 18th century the son of Francois de Troy'ya , - Jean Francois wrote a copy of the work of his father, which is not very well received.
 It remains to specify the date of the imprint, which is represented in the subject. So?

[Борис Кон]

Fed, this is not a mystery, it is called - the breadth of perception.

Your prenebrizhenie superfluous and irrelevant comparison, I would say unaesthetic.

[Fed]

Сообщение от redbor; 2260171"

which is not very well-received .

That is amazing. because son drew a better father, and that the price it significantly on the order.

Сообщение от Boris Cohn ; 2260191"

Your prenebrizhenie superfluous and irrelevant comparison

No, just right. The more you like evaluation and attribution. Attribution is not necessary , the assessment is elementary.
In another topic you have been asked , Why? this is necessary.

So I wonder - why not go for a specific subject .

[redbor]

Сообщение от Fed

is amazing.
because
son drew a better father,

Obviously, when the son of copying the work of his father, he is just learning the skill ...

[Fed]

Сообщение от redbor

obvious

Of course obvious.
Allegedly copied some work of his father, which has not survived, but it was certainly better.
  



Incredible, but true chain of assumptions.

[Артём]

Сообщение от kr555

read closely.

Attentively.
You wrote that:

Well, the author of the original completely different artist.

nothttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean_François_de_Troy (1679-1752)

Ahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/François_de_Troy(1645-1730)

And provides a link to Jean_François_de_Troy in post number 10.

I wrote about him.
You do not get confused?