Старый 10.02.2010, 10:47 Язык оригинала: Русский       #10
Гуру
 
Регистрация: 07.09.2008
Сообщений: 2,275
Спасибо: 2,232
Поблагодарили 1,366 раз(а) в 551 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 39
Репутация: 2484
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Meister Посмотреть сообщение
to invest in stocks, you should very well understand that you buy, and to monitor the situation on the market, so your shares are not turned into sheets of paper or a virtual registry entries.

Est 'riad konservativnyh aktsii, prakticheski bezriskovyh. Bonds daze luchshe.

To invest in art, you just need to read carefully at least this forum.

Eto budet grubeishei oshibkoi. Vy poteriaete vse den'gi.


In the art market, a huge number of names for secure attachment (I'm not talking about contemporary artists).

Sovershenno ne verno. Takih imion ochen 'malo.

Perhaps these investments and will bring huge revenues, but their money you will not lose, but with the shares is a big question.
Obiazatel'no poteriaete. Art rynok gorazdo bolee riskovyi, chem rynok aktsii i nedvizimosti.

Vnizu ia vylozil chast 'svoei stat'i o sravnenii investitsii. Pover'te ia sdelal ochen 'serioznoe issledovanie na etu temu i daze dissertatsiiu zaschitil.


Main differences between the share market and the art market:
• The art market is divided into "a series of several small fragmented markets influenced by unquantifiable factors such as fashion, degrees of restoration and aesthetic choice." (Chanin, 1990, p.77). There are substantial differences between the markets for paintings and prints, contemporary art and Old Masters paintings. In every case price is related to each particular subject.
• Hard to standardize - works of art are unique and practically unquantifiable.
• Consequently from the impossibility of standardization, there are no reliable sources of reference supporting investment in art.
21 • Art ownership carries some costs (such as restoration, framing, insurance, freight etc), which are not related to shares.
• Art has geographical boundaries (people tend to buy the art of their own country, and often undervalue foreign art) when shares have equal value internationally.
• There is often a considerable financial loss from commissions paid to dealers or auction houses when selling a painting (from 10-50%), but without a sale no money can be obtained (very seldom money can be loaned for the security of the art , but not a high percentage of the actual price).
• Art does not bring a regular income in the form of annual yield, unlike shares.
• There are many law related particularities (tax deductions, loss deduction, tax benefits etc), which differ between investment in shares and art investment.
"Art as an investment is a misconception that rests on false premises, both aesthetic and financial. Art is a matter of judgment. The word` art 'is value neutral ". This statement is in direct correlation with Marx's concept of "nothing can have value, without being an object of utility" (Marx, 1867), which was mentioned in the chapter on the `Commodification of art ', and it appears that Marx did not contradict himself.
"Art, however, proved unsuitable as a financial instrument, not only because of its illiquidity but because there is just not enough real art around"
__________________
www.anmedicalrecruitment.com.au



AlexanderG вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо AlexanderG за это полезное сообщение:
artcol (10.02.2010)
 

Метки
attribution of paintings

Опции темы
Опции просмотра

Ваши права в разделе
Вы не можете создавать новые темы
Вы не можете отвечать в темах
Вы не можете прикреплять вложения
Вы не можете редактировать свои сообщения

BB коды Вкл.
Смайлы Вкл.
[IMG] код Вкл.
HTML код Выкл.

Быстрый переход




Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 15:13.
Telegram - Обратная связь - Обработка персональных данных - Архив - Вверх


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Перевод: zCarot