The names of the ten "worst" of biblical passages

[dedulya37]

Originally Posted by Pavel

With bread I have everything in order. I can not pin a serious

And how to read the names of your paintings?

[Pavel]

Originally Posted by dedulya37

How to read the names of your paintings?

I'll write, I promise, but I think that picture says it all. Or should be said.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Originally Posted by Konstantin

I'm on convictions Krishnan, incidentally.

Here, you are interested in it should be.

[Тютчев]

Hare Krishnas as they are


«between India and the Hare Krishnas of our real India is the same difference

as between the powder "Zuko" and the juice of a living fetus ».


Continued here.

[Konstantin]

Originally Posted by Cyril Syzransky

Here you are interested to be.

Originally Posted by Tiutchev

"Between our India Krishna and the real India

This denomination is divided spheres of influence. Give this assessment, let alone take a side, I think, is irrelevant to faith.
Ret find black spots can be in the history of any religion. Rather in the media /representatives of these religions.
I'm not interested. It is also not interested in how to argue with an atheist, he comes to all when the time comes.

[Артём]

Originally Posted by Konstantin

This confession divide spheres of influence. Give this assessment, let alone take a side, I think, is irrelevant to faith.
Ret find black spots can be in the history of any religion. Rather in the media /representatives of these religions.

Plant a number of great teachers and they will find a common language and understanding. Plant with their students and they come to blows.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Originally Posted by "Konstantin

This confession divide spheres of influence.

Areas - things efimernye, but apples and oranges were real and it is just not shared.

[Fed]

Originally Posted by Tiutchev

" between India and the Hare Krishnas of our real India is the same difference
as between the powder "Zuko" and the juice of a living fetus. "

Continued here.

There's not a sequel, and the propaganda game. How ignorant it may be judged at least shown there is a drawing. The authors of the text of delusional attempt to fool readers signed a supposedly frightening picture that it depicts Krishna, although other traditions say that it depicts Shiva. There is shown the personality of God, who came to save the universe.
 
 This figure-illustration to the story:
Asura Hiranyakasipu wanted to become immortal and to achieve this goal was to expose myself unusually harsh austerity. Not content with his allocated period of life, he decided to become immortal and become lord of all the planets.
Brahma, pleased with perfect Hiranyakasipu austerity, has agreed to reward passed the test to fulfill his every desire. Immediately Hiranyakasipu asked Brahma to grant him immortality, to which Brahma replied that he was not able to do it, because he is not immortal. Then Hiranyakasipu asked Brahma to make him invulnerable, so that none of the created beings - whether living or inanimate creature, man, beast, virgin or someone else - could not kill him; Hiranyakasipu wanted to it could not strike down any weapons and that death is not caught up with him either at home or on the street, day or night, nor on earth nor in the air. He then asked to grant him full authority over all the planets and the inhabitants of the universe, and give the eight mystic powers.

Hiranyakasipu defeated all his rivals in each of the three worlds, and subdued all living beings, including devas and asuras.
     Vishnu assured the Devas that the suffering that causes Hiranyakasipu inhabitants of the universe, would soon run out. Vishnu came to the surprising appearance of Narasimha, chelovekolva. At twilight, he caught him, threw him to his knees, fingernails ripped his stomach and put his guts on your neck like a garland (that he did not break a promise Brahma Narasimha). Narasimha killed not only Hiranyakasipu, but many of his soldiers.

You can easily think of an analogy from Christianity on a square Hiranyakasipu demon who terrorized the entire world, and even higher planetary system, creating an army.

Therefore, the "frightening" picture has a normal explanation is supported charity of the Supreme Personality of Godhead.

[Pavel]

The very definition of "worst"? The Bible is sacred scripture. Word of mouth, so to speak. Therefore it is better to think why he said so, in whose favor, and everything becomes clear. And again I ask the question, why should we believe in this nonsense and Jewish gods to be Russian Orthodox? Weird?

Posted 3 minutes

Originally Posted by Konstantin

This confession divide spheres of influence. Give this assessment, let alone take a side, I think, is irrelevant to faith.
Ret find black spots can be in the history of any religion. Rather in the media /representatives of these religions.
I'm not interested. It is also not interested in how to argue with an atheist, he comes to all when the time comes.

Whom do you mean-Orthodox levoslavnyh Catholics masulman, Protestants, etc.? All believe in one god.

[Тютчев]

Originally Posted by Konstantin

This confession divide spheres of influence. Give this assessment, let alone take a side, I think, is irrelevant to faith.
Ret find black spots can be in the history of any religion. Rather in the media /representatives of these religions.
I'm not interested. It is also not interested in how to argue with an atheist, he comes to all when the time comes.

Konstantin, if you carefully read that article, to which I am giving this link, it could not not to draw attention to the fact that from the outset the author of articles Dworkin defines as the Hare Krishna sect, briefly telling the story of her sozdaniyai and the characteristics of the relationship with the Hindu confessions:

«Since 1971, Russia had been active neo-pagan cult" International Society for Krishna Consciousness (ISKCON). ISKCON was founded in 1966 in New York, a native of India, unfortunate salesman Abha Charanom De (better known under the honorary title of "His Divine Grace Srila Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada). He began promoting his theories among the hippies, drug addicts and the underclass of elements, which are made up the original core, and then to a large extent management team he founded the organization.

ISKCON is a typical neoreligioznoy psevdovostochnoy group, in many ways adjacent to the Neo-Pagan movement New Age («A New Era"). All statements ISKCON about his membership in traditional Hinduism, to put it mildly, exaggerated, since the traditional Hindu groups do not recognize him: the members of ISKCON is not even allowed to enter many Hindu temples (including one in which, according to legend, was born Krishna) ».


As you can see, it is clear that Krishna can not be called the representatives of Hinduism because Hindus themselves do not recognize them. Therefore, your characterization of relations between the Russian Orthodox Church to the Hare Krishnas as: "a denomination divided spheres of influence" - not consistent. I repeat once again, «The International Society for Krishna Consciousness (ISKCON) - a sect, who identify themselves as Hindus. In fact, by the Hindus, it does not apply, since is not recognized as representatives of iduistskoy confessions. The Hare Krishnas are building their teachings on traditional Hindu texts, but are not Hindus! This is one of the sects, which was organized in the U.S. in the recent past.