Glamor in the art

[Черномашенцев Владимир]

The most famous example for me of glamor - mature works of Klimt. I have seen in Vienna in the museum Belverer his work in the original. In this museum, according to a guide, the best collection of Klimt in Vienna. He began as an average impressionist, and then began to paint portraits to order wealthy audience. Portraits of themselves (ie person) - done poorly, but everything leads to admire, marvel and admire! Nakako printing and Chinese do not give up this great Glamor! The ideas of Klimt's Vienna is now half continues to earn and deserve. Example - jewelry-jewelry company Frey Ville (Math., can make a mistake in spelling). By the way, for girls, a trip to Vienna and purchase FreyVille there will be cheaper than in Moscow, even given a ticket and a hotel. The massive use of Klimt in contemporary jewelry and objects of interior proves that it glamor.

Tastes Veronique, destvitelno, women. This can be seen in this example and the works of Chinese artists that I have seen from Veronique earlier. In my "proletarian, the Russo-homespun taste, perhaps it is kitsch, but not worthy of glamor. But Veronique nobody makes their bad taste. If you like it - good. We can not live in a house where there are clear masterpieces - tired. It can not always read only one Dostoevsky. Katya needed for interior - personally, I bought enough of these, I confess. Some of them are now perceive itself as kitsch.

Veronique accept my apologies, because obviously he could hurt. But not out of malice. I have such a taste.


Here are photos of the museum-Belvedere Palace. Photograph Klimt made no sense.

And photos of interiors of the palace - also was once the glamor, and now it is considered art. as Klimt. Deservedly.