Art should be explaining?

[Vladimir]

If no lining, then it kontemporari have a chance. There are people who are in the city "Panels" haunted kitchen wooden batten. Explanation - I want to feel the heat, as in the country, as in the country house. Here they will always be on the walls hang "lilac" and kontemporari - even the spirit of it there is not even close, all the bayonets. And the usual logic: Kabakov with Malevich all lit, millions at auction to pay boobies, Hurst - huckster, and the king - always naked, without the slightest chance to cover his nakedness. I step over it - much harder than developing the logic of negation.

[gans]

Сообщение от Vladimir

If you do not bunk, then it kontemporari have a chance. There are people who are in the city "Panels" haunted kitchen wooden batten. Explanation - I want to feel the heat, as in the country, as in the country house. Here they will always be on the walls hang "lilac" and kontemporari - even the spirit of it there is not even close, all the bayonets. And the usual logic: Kabakov with Malevich all lit, millions at auction to pay boobies, Hurst - huckster, and the king - always naked, without the slightest chance to cover his nakedness.

It's all understandable. But you do not think that when people talk about "traditional" art, trying to draw attention to the quality of the object, but when people talk about "date" is: "You fools do not understand?

For me as a connoisseur including the "actual" art, this position (offended a lack of understanding) is not close.

[Yaya]

gans, and that such quality art object? works of the Impressionists in his time looked supernekachestvennymi (and not only them. Klimt paintings unloved you kicked out of university, for which he wrote them. because it is "vulgar scribble" outraged professors).
I'm not talking about that all objects of art are deteriorating (sooner or later)

[gans]

Сообщение от Yaya

gans, and what is the quality of the art object?

Yaya, you do not see the difference between "quality" and "quality"?
Or do you think that I did not know what to write, and I need to adjust a little bit?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от gans

Or do you think that I did not know what to write, and I need to adjust a little bit?

Here's my "correct", or rather point to the grammatical errors, which are often lapse inadvertently.
But how comforting to know that you read carefully, "with feeling, with properly, with deliberation! : D: D: D

[dedulya37]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

That's me "correct",

I think here you are wrong. : D

[Кирилл Сызранский]

dedulya37, why? I sometimes one party explicitly compilation errors and misprints dumped on the forum ... : D

[dedulya37]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

why?

'Correct' is not you, and gans 'a, in my opinion.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от dedulya37

'correct' is not you, and gans'a, in my opinion.

No, and I ... Sometimes ... Who in the school, apparently, Russian for "excellent" knew ...

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

That's me "correct",

[Allena]

Well, where ART-lover gone to! There's one conversation that our philosophical pretensions only he can with feeling, with properly, and slowly spread out on shelves!

See how interesting it turns out, only in terms of art-illiterate. But the freedom of art illiterate thought no one has canceled.

What is the relationship of mind and feelings in the perception of works of art? Gans rightly speaks of harmony, of a reasonable proportion. But how over time this ratio has changed, and changed it? (During the question for the end of the day, in a fresh mind is not coming).

Classical art - all well-known and simple plot, ie even implying an explanation. That is an appeal to the mind exists, but, if I may say so, the subconscious.

Later - an appeal to the sense, as an explanation, if not harm, in any case, is not required.

Socialist realism - an appeal not know what. For photographic memory or something.

Modern art in the first place drawn to the mind, a sense may or may not arise depending on how the mind wants.

From my confused calculations it turns out that over time the ratio of the mind /feeling in the birth of art was not constant, varied, and with large amplitude. Who thinks that?