Glamor in the art

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

Igor Guriev, assuming your promise, that Glamour is an idealization, then the whole socialist realism is the most glamorous "creative method"! (Because of nowhere, perhaps, not so much idealization and varnishing of reality)

I have no "promise", I relayed that thought about Zaryanko in the late 19 th century.
In socialist realism is no glamor nobody ever was, except Laktionova Alexander Ivanovich.
That's a real glamor!
Letter from the front!
Love it!
Hanging on the wall in the kitchen (reproduction, and not one of the seven authors of repetitions, unfortunately).
There was still Sovetskaya glamorous landscape: Boris V. Shcherbakov, for example, Lydia Brotskaya.
So who else glamor in socialist realism?
Well call.
Maya Kuzminichna Ungular, perhaps?

Added after 5 minutes

Сообщение от dedulya37

You Danilo Fedorova though obzovite pot, but man does what he can. And it may well, in my opinion. He really lives a modern life, and therefore popular in certain circles.
The only difference is that he is without any intelligent thinking about the art of earning enough money to feel free. His mother, for instance, he's birthday gift "Jaguar" (this machine for the uninformed)
So it asks: "...and you could play a nocturne ...", expensive artists?
That the same!

Who is Daniel Fedorov?
____________________
And you know, after all, the IMF also glamurcheg flickers places, but very metered, not going somewhere out there.
Oh, if only you knew how I was raving Stozharau years poppet five or six of my late adolescence and early youth!
Just raving!
And now I love.
A glamurcheg in his paintings barely glimpsed, and for that I love him too.
Because, and this should be in a good picture.
There have not been Surykova glamorous moment - and would be terrible, right?
And Repin, look Ikskul, glamorous flush, so what a thing, eh?
A matissovskaya Glamour since 1918?
Yes, even in the still life that is now exhibited at Sotheby?
(Or, as they say now literate, at Sotheby's).