Pre-funk, School of San Francisco

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

Well, the picture should or shining, like Matisse, or it must be shown the light, carried some svetopostanovka.

Take Caravaggio, Van Gogh, Laktionova - all of them have svetopostanovka, a light source that illuminates the objects, and the light plays on these subjects.

We take, on the other hand, "Zaporozhtsev" Repin: pale gray, uninteresting light, ruining everything.

Why? Of course, it's easier to paint, all in one tone, without harsh shadows.

The same applies to "the First Cavalry," by Alexander Gerasimov.

Of course, another of Picasso art system, there is no bulk items that you can mentally move in space, but the light at the Picasso is conditional, it is almost X-ray some - smooth, cool, etc.

Considering also that a strong colorist, he never was.

If all the artists were the same, then the art was not.
I have already said that the light and the lighting is not being. Painting emits light when properly constructed track and take the ratio. This is evident from Matisse and the Americans considered the school and generally doubtful light color in the picture is not installed, and create a composition.
 depending on the problem. When Picasso should he creates, as seen in the portrait Khokhlova and all his works live does not flap, as a recent exhibition at the CHA.
 And Picasso was not the system, he created the system. In general, look at pictures of his own and sostavte their opinion and not the total.