Catalog Sheets

[Allena]

In my opinion, Alexander offered a very reasonable and noble thing. Well, where, say, the neophyte learns to read akutsionnye catalogs, which in their casuistry not far removed from legal documents or scientific reports?
 
I think that we should not complicate anything and indulge in excessive seriousness and globalize any existing problems: There is no question about the guarantees of authenticity, etc. You know, in the years physicists have been poets such books "Physics joke" and "physicists continue to joke" ( who have, I recommend to read - mass transports). So there was a brilliant essay "How to read a scientific report" (alas, not at hand), where, in particular, we remember, 2 transferred from scientific-sounding language on human:
"during the experiment, the instrument has been damaged by accident" - read: dropped on the floor ;
"... with the device treated with the utmost caution" - read: dropped it on the floor . That, and Alexander offers roughly the same thing, only not in jest but in earnest. I think that his proposal will certainly be in demand.

Now regarding the names, regalia, etc.: I think that the format of this forum is all not necessary, without them all to communicate easier and easier. (Opinion given names, regalia, descriptions and dates, etc. is different, is not it?: Rolleyes

Here at the forum, really need something else: if there is doubt - it must be accompanied by arguments. (Do not want vstrevat in any debate about the examination of the pictures on the monitor, but sometimes even the plot can yell "I'm a fake!", Although similar manner ... not there, as well?: Shy - >

If there are arguments, then this is enough. And then - at everyone's head . This is exactly the case when easily separated cleaner Aunt Masha from the Committee of Rembrandt - they have different reasons for the findings.