Can a fake without a market?

[AlexanderG]

[QUOTE=mihailovoh;830582]

Сообщение от AlexanderG

 I do agree with the second definition.

 Mne ono toze blize.


With modern forgeries clear the artist is aware of what will be the use of his copy of the * application *. A signature is not relevant to the author and is poddelka.sovremenaya it net.dazhe or when the work performed by students.

Ne sovsem tak. Byl dlinneishii debat na etu temu, istochnik ne pomniu, eto bylo v moi gody obucheniia na Art History v Auckland NZ, no vyvod byl, chto podpis 'iavliaetsia integral'noi chast'iu kartiny, i pri kopirovanii ne vozbraniaetsia ee ispol'zovat' .

I have long exactly this question interisoval-whether my work kleverkov * * with the native signature S Klever be considered authentic. (Although on luxury provenans.ekspertizy GTG.Grabarya)
Naverno.kto thrill and for his Ayvazovski?

A kakova al'ternativa, kto schitaet, chto oni ne podlinnye?