Design - Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство

Деко · 14.12.2009, 20:13

I think when things are considered landmark in design, art in general - not enough just to see the object. You should know that the author advocates that develops, in which direction to move. In short, without the text in any way.
All eyes were on the square of Malevich and laughed. And when you start to read his theoretical writings, or about him - revealed very different faces. And the square look with different eyes - not as a picture of the child, as well as the creation of genius. And the poetry - always believed since childhood tale of the Golden Cockerel-comb just a fairy tale, but Pushkin - a poet, which is easy to rhyme. A revered - wrote the story under heavy predduelnoy impressions of the situation, thinking about loyalty to the kings of a word (Pushkin personally met with Nicholas and discussed the situation with Gekkernom, with the courting of his wife).
In the 60's sitting on a stool with three nozhkai of plywood and did not know what is the creation of the Finnish genius Alvar Aalto.
I think kitsch from art is distinguished by its essence - kitsch wants just outrageous, the art of looking for ways of development. Although the formal features, they may be similar.

Похожие темы
Тема	Автор	Разделы	Ответов	Последние сообщения
Christie's, contemporary design, London, 7.04.2009	Евгений	Auctions	0	27.04.2009 06:21
Design, contemporary art or decoration of interiors?	LCR	Exhibitions and events	2	26.04.2009 13:28
Design of the Odessa ghetto	gans	Art Movements	9	27.03.2009 12:05

14.12.2009, 20:13	Язык оригинала: Русский #22
Деко Местный Регистрация: 30.08.2009 Адрес: Киев Сообщений: 127 Спасибо: 332 Поблагодарили 278 раз(а) в 76 сообщениях Репутация: 535	I think when things are considered landmark in design, art in general - not enough just to see the object. You should know that the author advocates that develops, in which direction to move. In short, without the text in any way. All eyes were on the square of Malevich and laughed. And when you start to read his theoretical writings, or about him - revealed very different faces. And the square look with different eyes - not as a picture of the child, as well as the creation of genius. And the poetry - always believed since childhood tale of the Golden Cockerel-comb just a fairy tale, but Pushkin - a poet, which is easy to rhyme. A revered - wrote the story under heavy predduelnoy impressions of the situation, thinking about loyalty to the kings of a word (Pushkin personally met with Nicholas and discussed the situation with Gekkernom, with the courting of his wife). In the 60's sitting on a stool with three nozhkai of plywood and did not know what is the creation of the Finnish genius Alvar Aalto. I think kitsch from art is distinguished by its essence - kitsch wants just outrageous, the art of looking for ways of development. Although the formal features, they may be similar.