Relationship and mutual obligations between the artist and gallery owners

[ВЯЧЕСЛАВ]

Сообщение от Konstantin

Here are just understandable. If a case is correct and gallery of work and money invested in the promotion of the artist (a hundred times saying how), then to not have a situation-like artist, paintings, too, but I'll go buy directly to the artist because the lowest price. And the gallery is out of work.

As far as I know, the galleries do not do anything for nothing. Choose and reserve a couple of works.
And that means no inheritance? Exhibitions that for nothing? Former Pioneers and the police also handed out candy? A percentage of sales.
  Yes, and ascribe artists as peasants and estates in the 21 st Century - Do you approve?

Сообщение от dedulya37

A contract with the gallery, he showed you?

Even though a familiarity, would not ask pokazat.Esli used only by the artist himself .... And so, and did not mean to ask about the papers do not belong to me.