Glamor in the art

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от K-Maler

The report from NATA NOVA
Vasilyev did not otrylssya, but I did not like his jewelry. (It's glamor, glamor or bad kitsch? "And then. That he is" opened his mouth to Gurchenko "kitsch-like! (IMHO) The glamorous people themselves do not lead (IMHO) (or lead?)

K-Mahler:
Strange discussion. Vasiliev good artist, he works honestly in their subject - the history of costume and everything connected with it. Collects all that is connected with the topic. He lectures on the history of costume. He published excellent books about the beauties of the past ... On the true beauty ... All this required an honest passion. And he is a man who has a taste. Question on the topic under discussion should be put to him - he is in her specialist, professional ...
     

Not discuss the work Vasiliev, Nathan Novska perception (impression) Vasilevskij massive rings and Basil relation to domestic (ex?) Idols .. IN EYES NEW Nata this discrepancy to the status, which is inherent in a person with such a reputation. NATA believes that he has every right to have their own personal perceptions, judgments, and "dissenting opinion" as about the individuals and the historical situation. NATA NOVA explores not work, but bivehioralnye (ie, behavioral) features mentioned personalities .. . exclusively for her (NataNovinoy) system of moral and aesthetic values ...