16.05.2009, 14:12
|
Язык оригинала: Русский
#10
|
|
Старожил
Регистрация: 09.12.2008
Адрес: Москва, Жуковский
Сообщений: 671
Спасибо: 1,763
Поблагодарили 720 раз(а) в 167 сообщениях
Репутация: 1199
|
Цитата:
Сообщение от Nedogonov
I think that the rude people and the bacillus was actively proliferate at the time (or near the time), when sounded phrase "degenerate art". And flew it to the topic with my keyboard, what, and expressed regret so far.
The fact that the concept of "degenerate art" was a result of processes is quite natural and logical, nominalizirovano, and then tightly tied to its meaning, to the destructive activities of the Nazis. Own is the meaning of the term with lost.
In essence, the term became taboo and people are already on a subconscious level, trying to push him away and "ban", using any means available, even foul language. On the original meaning of the term no longer remember.
This phenomenon is and his own inside. Everything that is designed to protect degenrativnoe art - green street. Same dared cast their vote for its rejection as soon possible to label the Nazis, fascists, hruschevista, putinista, Nashi, etc., etc., pr ... This is the stumbling block.
|
In this, as I think you're right. And as if you have not rearranged the words - "CI" or "ID" - it is still referring to the historical terminology ... And therefore, if you are trying to identify some new trends of modern "art", albeit unpleasant neither you nor many others, is not it better to use more neutral terms, not a priori cause of protest enlightened minority?
|
|
|