Question?

[DSF]

Personally, I can only express their opinions about the artist, the painting which I saw in the original. Make any conclusions based on the image on the monitor, I know not. Art is too difficult. So I'd rather say nothing.
     In general, if an artist exhibiting his paintings on public display, it should be ready to hear any opinions, including unflattering. And anyone who saw them, has the right to speak as he pleases. However, I do not quite understand why the artist to listen to it all? Is it adds to it talent? Maybe he sees his weaknesses and will work better? I strongly doubt this. All public activities of the artist seeks only to attract buyers. If we could do without all this fuss, it would be wonderful.

Сообщение от Fed

Then the result and called art, but not exclusively by sublimation. Is this the result of the product only for consumption by a group of people who have learned some humanities? Yes - if only they would consume this product.

And if the painting to someone else like - well, well!
Well, if now and then placed in a museum, reproductions printed on wrappers and hung on Tverskaya Street, the artist has is to blame

Сообщение от curious

Of course, every artist considers himself a genius.

No, not everyone. Only Pavel