Glamor in the art

[Veronic]

Сообщение от Chernomashentsev Vladimir

The most famous example for me of glamor - mature works of Klimt.
And photos of interiors of the palace - also was once the glamor, and now it is considered art. as Klimt. Deservedly.

Probably the courtiers and artists who portrayed coquettes at one time suffered greatly from their peers ....
Nata, I also think that the definition of kitsch is more applicable to the Soviet period. By the way, those who criticize him most often are surprised to find him in his apartment, such as elephants or a memorable grandmother's carpet on the walls.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 2 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Chernomashentsev Vladimir

I as always, very good individual determination of glamor and kitsch. If you look, and it was like - it glamor. If you look, and feel ashamed to wear - is kitsch.
I love to buy my beloved wife jewelry - Swarovski FreyVille and others less known. Wonderful silver from the Moscow firm "Metaplastika. Very inexpensive (all at the price of gold, but good job, especially in their "Animal"). This - glamor and art, even art design.
And you can see from the Turkish gold with diamonds at the price of jewelry. This is kitsch.

But some seem that the opposite is true.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 4 minutes[/color]
It will be very interesting if someone could examples (photos) to show their vision.