Is it possible to protect from vandalism?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от igorr

Yes, but then the forum is moderated . You close some threads blocking temporarily or permanently Some panelists . There is a rule that all those in the sale section should present the image - so you're protecting people from dubious offers . Well, why do this when you do not protect , at least once , sellers?

it's not a surprise to anyone that the world of art critics and a lot of opinions. one likes one another more. but if you allow each pass vykrivivat comments on prices due to this or that picture, it just undermines the level of the most proschadki . it makes some bazaar , not a civilized market. You follow the same reputation ?

Think .. and it is too one-sided <! - ~ 4 ~ - > yes and shows how this theme , created a long time and do not lose interest for 5 years , it is relevant (maybe not for everyone, but then offer paintings , not all participants ) .

Added after 9 minutes

I think in the case of frank discussion falshakov acceptable.

I say ban the flood , not otosyaschihsya to discuss the exposed lot in expressing opinions about the significance or insignificance of the artist , and so at least , discussion of prices just need to ban

Сообщение от igorr; 2891791"

simple rule - do not comment on the sale price in the section \\\\ buying.

The logic in this.
One thing " discussions and comments ", another - statements by price offered for sale .