|
Sell Sale of artworks. |
![]() |
|
|
Опции темы | Опции просмотра |
![]() |
Язык оригинала: Русский #1 |
Новичок
Регистрация: 06.05.2012
Сообщений: 21
Спасибо: 3
Поблагодарили 4 раз(а) в 4 сообщениях
Репутация: 7
|
![]()
The information is deleted.
administration. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Язык оригинала: Русский #2 |
Гуру
Регистрация: 21.10.2009
Сообщений: 2,797
Спасибо: 3,657
Поблагодарили 4,885 раз(а) в 2,055 сообщениях
Репутация: 9044
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо Toinen за это полезное сообщение: | John Preston (16.07.2012) |
![]() |
Язык оригинала: Русский #3 |
Старожил
Регистрация: 15.03.2011
Сообщений: 588
Спасибо: 290
Поблагодарили 427 раз(а) в 181 сообщениях
Репутация: 817
|
![]()
Of course, there is a sense - do not spread the photos of the picture.
One person will buy (if you buy it), but twenty of forum wit, no known non-buyers, will cause poumnichat in the subject line. Moreover, the louder the proposed name, the more they flock to it! In this situation, I'm sure many sellers lose the desire to spread the serious stuff here. And buyers are also arranged in different ways: one nicer in person and buy the thing on the public auction, the other more willing to acquire it for the money directly from the owners and nothing without advertising ... In support of his views suggest wishing to return a couple of years ago in this section and see how much the level of sentences. That, at least immediately accessible from the first - one hundred and first page. June 2010go: Vakhrameev, Klimenko, Makovsky, Golovin, Gerasimov, Fonvizin Verey, Survage ... And because the market itself has not changed much! Hence, we can assume that the reason in the formulation of this case on the forum. Clearly, this is contrary to the rules of the forum, but why these rules are not changed? In order not to look like a sort of non-constructive critic, will offer proposals to legalize the practice of expensive things, like the one in question in this thread. At the same time, in parallel to send photos of the administration to confirm validity, so to speak, "their claims." Maybe it will add a bit of administration work, but for the benefit of such an important section will go for sure! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Язык оригинала: Русский #4 |
Гуру
Регистрация: 20.03.2008
Сообщений: 8,085
Спасибо: 3,353
Поблагодарили 25,444 раз(а) в 5,540 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 250
Репутация: 23525
|
![]()
This is bad advice - to recommend to violate forum rules.
Put please, photographs of the subject.
__________________
AI в Telegram: https://t.me/artinvestmentru AI на Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/artinvestment |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Язык оригинала: Русский #5 | ||
Гуру
Регистрация: 26.07.2008
Адрес: РФ, Самара
Сообщений: 75,397
Спасибо: 27,867
Поблагодарили 55,329 раз(а) в 24,282 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 133
Репутация: 102389
|
![]() Цитата:
Well, you gave examples of the proposals in this section of the June 2010go : Цитата:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Язык оригинала: Русский #6 |
Старожил
Регистрация: 15.03.2011
Сообщений: 588
Спасибо: 290
Поблагодарили 427 раз(а) в 181 сообщениях
Репутация: 817
|
![]()
I would not recommend anyone to violate forum rules.
I just suggested to think about that for the good of the cause, these rules change slightly. As for the alleged flow falshakov, it is unlikely to greatly increase: REAL buyers of expensive things, it's usually - people are competent and capable to determine the intended purchase. In addition, I offered to send along photos of the Administration for prior approval. I also think that the situation will be regulated naturally. People who tried to sell the photos without the trash and seeing a complete lack of interest in it, will quickly realize this unpromising classes. Personally for myself any potential problems with this I do not see. With many participants of the forum, whose opinion I value, the sign in person. Prepravit can easily picture them in a personal thing, which I doubt, and their views of the bear for themselves than from reading dozens of unknown whose hilarious comments that, though uplifting, the cause of truth are not very ... And actually, I would like to hear from the holders of expensive things, out (or feared to spread) them here. After all, serious buyers on this forum quite a lot, and severity of sentences far behind. All agree? So must be a reason! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Язык оригинала: Русский #7 | |
Гуру
Регистрация: 20.03.2008
Сообщений: 8,085
Спасибо: 3,353
Поблагодарили 25,444 раз(а) в 5,540 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 250
Репутация: 23525
|
![]() Цитата:
__________________
AI в Telegram: https://t.me/artinvestmentru AI на Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/artinvestment |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо Vladimir за это полезное сообщение: | Toinen (16.07.2012) |
![]() |
Язык оригинала: Русский #8 |
Старожил
Регистрация: 15.03.2011
Сообщений: 588
Спасибо: 290
Поблагодарили 427 раз(а) в 181 сообщениях
Репутация: 817
|
![]()
The rules, as I guess the reality of preparing for a long time and during that time has changed.
However, ready to agree with the fact that on any level stuff will be offered here, the administration, as they say, neither hot nor cold. If, indeed, the "educational function" section of the a priori more important than this, then I have nothing to argue. There are no innovations that would suit absolutely everyone. The thing is that the changes were positive IN GENERAL. Irrespective of the photo sale, why not enter the list of participants who tried to sell 100%proven falshakov? What is not "educational function"? Maybe someone without the intention of trying to do it, then let yourself blame in the end, with every going to happen. As they say, once a ... - not my fault. And if a few Seen in this, then - a trend ... On the example of the topic: In my opinion, the thing described is quite informative. You can go to the section of artists and prices, look at these sample results Sudeikin and if you feel that you can about "fit" is to contact the seller for a photo, perhaps out of delicacy, first inquiring the price. I repeat, do not urge to turn this approach into a regular practice, and allow it only for SERIOUS expensive things. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Язык оригинала: Русский #9 | |
Гуру
Регистрация: 26.07.2008
Адрес: РФ, Самара
Сообщений: 75,397
Спасибо: 27,867
Поблагодарили 55,329 раз(а) в 24,282 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 133
Репутация: 102389
|
![]() Цитата:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Язык оригинала: Русский #10 |
Старожил
Регистрация: 15.03.2011
Сообщений: 588
Спасибо: 290
Поблагодарили 427 раз(а) в 181 сообщениях
Репутация: 817
|
![]()
In my opinion, it is clear that I had in mind things that may be offered to other parties without the pictures , just like in this thread and me in this case it is not.
And you , Cyril , do not want to see more good things suggested in this thread ? Or do you see any other reason that the proposal in this segment is lagging behind demand, except that I called ? Here , though , I have laid out an example of a picture Zarubina : http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=152591 A small , insignificant thing ( although, too, not two pennies ) and, thanks to good people , lay out the scans from the exhibition catalog , the discussion was completed successfully . But , you see, amateurs shitting in other people's themes is missing and , after reading this " showdown " , the holders of the really serious things are unlikely to have a desire to put them here for everyone to see . First of all, I personally see this proposal justify expensive items without photos . |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
||||
Тема | Автор | Разделы | Ответов | Последние сообщения |
Painting | pinea | Costs, valuation, attribution | 0 | 06.02.2011 21:36 |
Painting | vyadem | Costs, valuation, attribution | 9 | 04.02.2011 15:53 |
What a picture | egen | Appraisal | 4 | 01.02.2011 16:07 |
Painting NH | NATA-BAT | Costs, valuation, attribution | 6 | 29.11.2009 23:58 |
Birthday Sudeikina Sergei Yurevich | eva777 | Artists, artworks, art history | 1 | 19.03.2009 15:13 |
|