Продам: Painting S.Sudeykina

[Мария Торонтовна]

The information is deleted.

administration.

[Toinen]

Сообщение от Maria Torontovna

picture of a beautiful

And where is the picture that?

[AlexSpb]

Of course, there is a sense - do not spread the photos of the picture.
One person will buy (if you buy it), but twenty of forum wit, no known non-buyers, will cause poumnichat in the subject line. Moreover, the louder the proposed name, the more they flock to it!
In this situation, I'm sure many sellers lose the desire to spread the serious stuff here. And buyers are also arranged in different ways: one nicer in person and buy the thing on the public auction, the other more willing to acquire it for the money directly from the owners and nothing without advertising ...
In support of his views suggest wishing to return a couple of years ago in this section and see how much the level of sentences. That, at least immediately accessible from the first - one hundred and first page. June 2010go: Vakhrameev, Klimenko, Makovsky, Golovin, Gerasimov, Fonvizin Verey, Survage ...
And because the market itself has not changed much! Hence, we can assume that the reason in the formulation of this case on the forum.

Clearly, this is contrary to the rules of the forum, but why these rules are not changed? In order not to look like a sort of non-constructive critic, will offer proposals to legalize the practice of expensive things, like the one in question in this thread. At the same time, in parallel to send photos of the administration to confirm validity, so to speak, "their claims."
Maybe it will add a bit of administration work, but for the benefit of such an important section will go for sure!

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от AlexSpb

Of course, there is a sense - do not upload photos of paintings.

This is bad advice - to recommend to violate forum rules.
Put please, photographs of the subject.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от AlexSpb; 2170681"

Of course, there is a sense - do not upload photos of paintings .

But the meanings of any possible head and share a lot .

Well, you gave examples of the proposals in this section of the June 2010go :

Vakhrameev , Klimenko , Makovsky , Golovin , Gerasimov , Fonvizin Verey , Survage ...

And I can give you an example as there are many times tried to offer a well-known forgery - aged lap without a birochkami stretchers on the back - there is also sounding names were , but as soon as the photos of these things, everyone understood that it was all a fake cover those " from Chernigov ".

[AlexSpb]

I would not recommend anyone to violate forum rules.
I just suggested to think about that for the good of the cause, these rules change slightly.

As for the alleged flow falshakov, it is unlikely to greatly increase: REAL buyers of expensive things, it's usually - people are competent and capable to determine the intended purchase. In addition, I offered to send along photos of the Administration for prior approval.

I also think that the situation will be regulated naturally. People who tried to sell the photos without the trash and seeing a complete lack of interest in it, will quickly realize this unpromising classes.

Personally for myself any potential problems with this I do not see. With many participants of the forum, whose opinion I value, the sign in person. Prepravit can easily picture them in a personal thing, which I doubt, and their views of the bear for themselves than from reading dozens of unknown whose hilarious comments that, though uplifting, the cause of truth are not very ...

And actually, I would like to hear from the holders of expensive things, out (or feared to spread) them here.
After all, serious buyers on this forum quite a lot, and severity of sentences far behind. All agree? So must be a reason!

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от AlexSpb; 2170731"

I just suggested to think about that for the good of the cause , these rules change slightly .

This strong mind when preparing the rules. Forum is not only someone's commercial interests , but also has an educational function . In his examples, people learn . If a person tries to reach an audience of thousands , the return is required to comply with the rules. Otherwise it will be empty , " the mysterious " themes , hints , without prices , and photos. The rest need it?

[AlexSpb]

The rules, as I guess the reality of preparing for a long time and during that time has changed.
However, ready to agree with the fact that on any level stuff will be offered here, the administration, as they say, neither hot nor cold. If, indeed, the "educational function" section of the a priori more important than this, then I have nothing to argue.

There are no innovations that would suit absolutely everyone. The thing is that the changes were positive IN GENERAL.
Irrespective of the photo sale, why not enter the list of participants who tried to sell 100%proven falshakov? What is not "educational function"? Maybe someone without the intention of trying to do it, then let yourself blame in the end, with every going to happen. As they say, once a ... - not my fault. And if a few Seen in this, then - a trend ...

On the example of the topic: In my opinion, the thing described is quite informative.
You can go to the section of artists and prices, look at these sample results Sudeikin and if you feel that you can about "fit" is to contact the seller for a photo, perhaps out of delicacy, first inquiring the price.

I repeat, do not urge to turn this approach into a regular practice, and allow it only for SERIOUS expensive things.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от AlexSpb; 2170731"

With many forum members , whose opinion I value , the sign in person. Prepravit can easily picture them in a personal thing , which I doubt , and their views of the bear for themselves than from reading dozens of unknown whose hilarious comments that , though uplifting , the cause of truth are not so much ...

What's the problem ? You should not have it - you can not shine here photos " SERIOUS expensive things ."

[AlexSpb]

In my opinion, it is clear that I had in mind things that may be offered to other parties without the pictures , just like in this thread and me in this case it is not.

And you , Cyril , do not want to see more good things suggested in this thread ? Or do you see any other reason that the proposal in this segment is lagging behind demand, except that I called ?

Here , though , I have laid out an example of a picture Zarubina :
http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=152591
A small , insignificant thing ( although, too, not two pennies ) and, thanks to good people , lay out the scans from the exhibition catalog , the discussion was completed successfully .
But , you see, amateurs shitting in other people's themes is missing and , after reading this " showdown " , the holders of the really serious things are unlikely to have a desire to put them here for everyone to see .
First of all, I personally see this proposal justify expensive items without photos .