Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 01.04.2014, 16:35 Язык оригинала: Русский       #8
Гуру
 
Регистрация: 26.10.2008
Сообщений: 1,026
Спасибо: 75
Поблагодарили 915 раз(а) в 329 сообщениях
Репутация: 1815
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Maroussia Посмотреть сообщение
khmelev,

Leaving aside strashshshnye medical analogy , really want to understand :
- Azadovsky achieved institute proceedings
- Or now " under the deal Basner " journalists whipped the old foam on the principle:



Everything that is written in the article , including " priborchiki " - discussed on the forum competent parties are still three or four years ago :
http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=84111

Something as of today has changed? ( in connection with the mention in the article of Police)
Maybe you aware ?
***
I understand Azadovsky quoted audit materials in their statements as a result of which he refused to initiate criminal proceedings. And in my view rightly , p.ch. no elements of crime there. Article is interesting because it reveals an " third front " in Basner . P.ch. this is the article for Basner , but not against Vasilyeva and clearly against the museum . And strongly opposed . It is necessary to understand a fresh mind . <! - ~ 1 ~ ->



khmelev вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо khmelev за это полезное сообщение:
Маруся (01.04.2014)