Mitka, a stop on a 25-year anniversary. The exhibition in St. Petersburg

[fabosch]

November 5, 2010 at the Central Exhibition Hall Manege in St. Petersburg opened a large retrospective exhibition "Mitka, stopping at 25 years."
Unfortunately exhibition will last long - until November 14, 2010.

I promise pictures from the opening

[fabosch]

Today is the opening of the exhibition. People gathered to surprise many. Was a "grand" part, but, thank God, not for long. Commanded a parade of Mitya Shagin. Acted mainly themselves Mitka and speshl Gast "from the Paris Valentin Til Samarin.
Catches the eye for the absence of three key figures Mitkov - Shinkareva and O & A Florensky. This was due to have occurred de facto relationships break all sorts of characters with the aforesaid current leader Mitkov - Dmitry Shagin. And the right to deal ended their personal lack of - is not so bad. But the exhibition was not submitted O & A Florenskie and Mission Shinkareva can not be considered complete (in my opinion, a total of 6 works). This is despite the fact that all the major figures Mitki movement in addition to a general exposition and special projects section each had 18 meters of personal exposure. Whatever the causes of the conflict and whether there is a right and wrong, one can say without any doubt: the viewer will only hurt. Such a phenomenon as Mitki not be imagined without Shinkareva and Florensky. History of Art requires for its scene of all persons involved!
But back to the main theme. The exposition took all two floors of an arena. The ground floor was allotted to the section of "Friends", which had little personal exposure of artists, close to the movement (G. Ustyugov, O. Frontinsky, I. Kirillova, AA Nekrasov, K. Miller, etc.), and section "Projects" where they were showing some of the exhibitions Mitkov. Also on the first floor were placed Mitkovskaya "objects, photographs, documents relating to the movement, etc.
On the second floor - a small section of "Fathers", which was presented by the artists of the older generation, to a large extent influenced the formation of creative Mitkov: Ow. Shagin, A. Arefiev, P. Vasmi, S. Schwartz, N. Zilina, B. Smelov. The remainder of the second floor has been given under the personal section of the band members and a small overall exposure.
Attached are photos.
Tomorrow will try to lay out yet - at least for a couple of works each artist
Comments to the photo:
2 - advocates D. Shagin, a shirt - the exhibition's curator L. Skobkina
3 - How do you like this band in striped bathing suits? 
4 - eternal theme
5 - Valentin Samarin, Dmitry Shagin
6 - collector Jacob Kalmans shamelessly kisses artist Irina Vasilyeva
8 - object "coffee cup"
9 - Yu Molodkovets and D. Shagin try on the dimensionless vest
10 - G. Ustyugov, O. Frontinsky and D. Shagin

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от fabosch

Mitya

I do not understand this move.
If there was something there in the beginning, now it has degenerated into some kind of a la-skits, in my opinion, some went memoir published about this "movement", some kind of endless "but do you remember ..." Yes there remember that? What have we done, what is the difference in art? Who knows it is their art outside of their parties and some outside of Peter?
 And there was a movement? Some group of artists, eccentric uncles with invented vocabulary, in the vest (and why vests that?) Were, for lack of anything at all in the iso, to a local television station, St. Petersburg picked it as something of themselves and rushed to the soul Paradise: a never ending story inarticulate about something, very little art, but a lot of insightful "Duc, Elah, burns, svidetelstvuschie now, after years of" Duc, "only that and say something substantive and nothing ...
No, I do not cut in ... Apparently, the mind is not enough, kerf.

[Игорь Гурьев]

And in my opinion, pretty movement, such as stumps, primitives, vest - sailor shirt, unbuttoned soul, a certain warmth of the company, extrapolated outside ...
As the author of the first printed the preface to the first printed the story of Mitya in the newspaper "Russian thought" (about 1986/1987 years) I have, in general, are still not disappointed, but flirting with Michi Shagin pedriotami and putinoidami.

Keep warm memories of meetings with Mitya in Paris in the basement of Khvostenko somewhere in the early 21 th century.
It is a pity that he had already stopped drinking.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

[QUOTE="Guriev, Igor; 1366711]In my opinion, a nice move[/QUOTE]

And in my opinion, sad Gamna ...

[size="1"]Added after 2 minutes[/size]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

the first printed introduction to the first printed the story about ...

... Artists?

Do not think this is funny: a preface to the first story of an artist.
And the pictures are not interesting I see? Or is it that this better story to write yes to it yet and the preface?

Added after 2 minutes

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

the first printed introduction to the first printed the story about ...

... Artists?

Do not think this is funny: a preface to the first story of an artist.
And the pictures are not interesting I see? Or is it that this better story to write yes to it yet and the preface?

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от "Cyril Syzransky

.. artists?

No, on the behavioral phenomenon Mitko, a description of their behavior, priskazok and so on.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от "Guriev, Igor

No, on the behavioral phenomenon Mitko, a description of their behavior, priskazok and so on.

And Mitka who?
Do not artists?
Animals guinea?
"The description of their behavior," ... uh, okay ...

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

A Mitka who? Do not artists?

I did not know they were artists.

By the way, you're talking about a circle of Stankevich's ever heard?

I mean, that Bakunin, Belinsky and Stankevich in their correspondence may be brought by your experimental animals, but the value of their circle, not only in what they can do so for you.

Yes, and early German Romantics, for example. Not pochityvali about them?

In general, the funny: I did not try anything to persuade the *, simply voicing his opinion.

As for you, comrade. Syzran, then I got the impression that you are all certainly want to make sure that only you are right.

This is usually a sign of weakness and internal positions unconvincing.

-------------
* Wed "Mitka anyone not want to win."

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor; 1366781"

What's up to you, comrade. Syzran, then I got the impression that you are all certainly want to make sure you are right only.

I'm just asking questions to people who, in my opinion, unlike me understand something in these Mitka.
You have to answer to these questions can not, as I understand, and asking me to remember the circle of Stankevich, Bakunin, Belinsky and Gogol from the market will bear, and are interested in, I do not pochityval "early German Romantics."

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

It's usually a sign of weakness and internal positions unconvincing.

 Yes, probably you are right ... Tob. Syzran "certainly wants to persuade," but "weak" and "intrinsically unpersuasive." Exactly.

[artcol]

It is strange that subculture embraced, though like, judging by izerpiku fabosch, there is a painting of some sort.