Unknown artist from a good company

[chealex]

That such a picture in your court. Interestingly Your opinion about the work, can someone, it will cause some kind of association, perhaps someone familiar with the mountain, which depicted the artist, etc. My first impression of it was negative. Also there were a few of the Crimean works Yartseva GF, dated late 1890 - early 1900's.
Yartsev Gregory F. (1858, Moscow - 1918, ibid)
Painter
First lessons of painting was in Sunday school at the Stroganov School, where he studied at the school. He studied at Moscow University (1877-1882) and in parallel was a volunteer at the Moscow School of Painting and Sculpture (?). In early 1880 he took lessons in painting VD Polenov, AA Kisileva. In 1898 he was seconded to the Imperial Geographical Society in Eastern Siberia, France (1900), the Caucasus (1901), on Mount Athos (1905) to create a series of landscapes. He lived in Yalta (1897-1907), working forester. Was a member of the Yalta city council and a member of the County Council. Worked in Bessarabia (1907-1908). From 1914 to settle permanently in Moscow, where he taught drawing at the women's courses. Exhibitions TPHV (since 1885, since 1899 Member TPHV).
Gregory F. Yartsev was one of those native artists who developed the amazing phenomenon of our fine art of the last decades of the XIX century - Russian landscape painting - in breadth. His views of southern nature, the southern village of support among the public who are familiar with them at the exhibitions of the Association of Traveling Art Exhibitions (since 1885). Gorky in 1908.

[Игорь Гурьев]

Rare muck, written with a maximum of three years ago.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

Rare muck, written with a maximum of three years ago.

At the expense of "dirty tricks" do not know, "the taste, the color, but about" three years "I know for sure, and much more.
This can be seen in the photograph as a host over the top stretcher bar.
Look at yourself.

[Allena]

I think this is an unfinished work.

[chealex]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

Rare muck, written with a maximum of three years ago.

Thanks for the tip, but the assessment can not agree. In general, this extreme categorical, in my opinion, borders on stupidity. Distinguish the painting a three-year statute of limitations on a half-century may even yesterday's amateur. To your chagrin (maybe!) Itself to such am not. As I wrote in his report - this landscape seemed to me weak, but everyone has the right to make mistakes. Therefore, put on your discussion.

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от chealex

And in general, this extreme categorical, in my opinion, borders on stupidity.
Distinguish the painting a three-year statute of limitations on a half-century may even yesterday's amateur.

In this photo?


You probably have not seen an artificial and very skillfully aged painting.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

You probably have not seen an artificial and very skillfully aged painting.

But you and show pictures of pictures "artificially aged and very skillful, interesting to see.

[Игорь Гурьев]

[/QUOTE]
No hand.

A general picture of 50-year-old does this particularly different from three years ago.
For example, in the studio Victor Ivanov they can distinguish only stylistically.

[chealex]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

According to pictures?

You probably have not seen an artificial and very skillfully aged painting.

But, believe me - this is not the case. People who found the painting in the attic, it just gave me, because Nothing in this is not understood.
A picture really is difficult to determine the age, so it's best to be sensitive.

[NEO]

That's the charm, I think, in constant readiness, waiting to change ...
Where is the way, sorry if you said something not quite right