A stack of theses on the market confusion

[Art-lover]

(in connection with the theme misunderstanding Market)

A work of art - a thing in itself, and if anyone thinks that he understands what a work of art, it is simply not aware of their misunderstanding.
The artist understands his work no more than a spectator.
The fact that a work of art is clear - is not art. Understanding available ideographic rather than artistic component.

You can not separate the mimetic, expressive and symbolic incarnation of art.

Art History should be rewritten as a history of misunderstanding of art, and this history would be more adequate to its object.

Art market does not exist.
Under this title, operating a number of different commodity markets with their specific utility value, none of which is not art, although the goods in these markets and denominated as a work of art.
The only common characteristic of the subjects of the art market "is that these items are used in determining the narratives of art.

Try to assign a work of art is not an act of delayed understanding, but there is an existential act of changing the modus vivendi (way of living) the purchaser, removes the dilemma "to have or be."
The essence and implications of this act are subjective, and transcendent, so it can not be regarded as something utilitarian, like the special use value on the art market.
Acquisition of art objects for the sake of their utility or other perceivable qualities are ignoring the specificity of art objects, ie use them for other purposes.