Careless owners have removed the monument

[Allena]

Heritage Committee set a precedent for removal of the monument abusive owner
June 10, 2008 the Moscow City Court upheld a claim Moscow Heritage Committee for exemption from property estate Kolesnikova-Sargino-Shapatinoy. Today, it is safe to say that the case of Taganka Square, 88, p. 1 - a precedent not only for Moscow, but Russia's legislation, as it was the court's decision to delete the monument from unscrupulous owner (!).

Читать дальше... 

New History of the main house urban estate VF Kolesnikova-Sargino-M.E.Shapatinoy, W. end of the XVIII-beginning of the twentieth century. at: Taganskaja Sq., d.88, p.1. - An object of cultural heritage of regional significance, is privately owned - that began when the Moscow Heritage Committee inspection revealed serious violations in the use of the building, namely: lack of security commitments, provisions for the regulations of the RF, the lack of coherent documentation for works at the facility, which resulted in monument has been changed beyond recognition. As a result of illegal actions of the owner instead of the main house urban estate con. 18. Built in the classical style "Empire", the center of the capital has acquired an ugly amount of style "garage warehouse" architecture. Requirements Moscow Heritage Committee on the urgent suspension of all work proprietress of the building ignored. Then on Dec. 10, 2007 Heritage Committee has been seized to the owner of the building, and on the fact of damage to cultural heritage sites have been prosecuted.
  May 7, 2008 claim Moscow Heritage Committee was satisfied. However, the proprietress of the monument sought to challenge the decision of the court, and on June 10 in the Moscow City Court held the complaint of the owner of the building to address Tagansky district court on May 7, 2008. But the Moscow City Court in responding to the appeal dismissed and ruled in favor of the Moscow Heritage Committee. Further actions of the Government of Moscow - the redemption of the building by the Department of the Moscow City property from the owner, but given the damage the monument. Now it is important that the user found that in the future to restore this unique object.
Despite the fact that the object has already suffered enough from the hands of unscrupulous owner, he was unable to fully implement vandalny plan to rebuild the monument - not a secret that close to the building was already dug pit, designed for new construction. In this case, the owner of the monument not only ignored the requirements of Moscow Heritage Committee for urgent suspension of all work, but also ignored the laws of Russia.
Decisive action by Moscow Heritage Committee and the historical in its essence a decision Tagansky Court Manor V.F.Kolesnikova-Sargino-M.E.Shapatinoy must tame the fervor of those users monuments that consumers' are our priceless heritage, every brick of which - some of our great history. On the cultural heritage should claim only those who are really willing to take the restoration and preservation of architectural monuments. In addition, greater control over the use of monuments, evident in Moscow today: heavy fines, termination of lease agreements, termination of right to use the monument - all of this is particularly important in a situation of lifting the moratorium on the privatization of cultural heritage.
07 августа 2008