Вернуться   Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство > English forum > Investing in Art
 English | Русский Forum ARTinvestment.RU RSS Регистрация Дневники Справка Сообщество Сообщения за день Поиск

Investing in Art Share your opinion about the profitability of investments.

Ответ
 
Опции темы Опции просмотра
Старый 24.01.2010, 17:42 Язык оригинала: Русский       #1
Гуру
 
Регистрация: 16.04.2008
Сообщений: 1,213
Спасибо: 1,422
Поблагодарили 7,269 раз(а) в 947 сообщениях
Репутация: 5499
По умолчанию Is this true?

Deducted the following story. In the mid 90-ies, one investor bought for $ 8 million drawings model Helga Testorf American artist Andrew Wyeth, along with copyright. A few years later, he received 1.2 million for participating in these drawings in three exhibitions, 2,8 million in a copyright interest in the publication of the museum catalog, at variance circulation of 400 thousand copies, and 40 million at the resale of these drawings a Japanese collector. Moreover, he retained the right to reproduce images on posters and prints, estimated at 9.12 million dollars.
Astonished. First, I never met with the fact that the product is officially sold with copyright, that it may be a document certifying the copyright, for example, to reproduce this work on posters? Secondly, how many times I gave works from his collection to participate in exhibitions, including foreign ones, no one has ever even hinted about any money. Thirdly, if my works were included in any directories or books, then the surcharge is usually offered to me. As far as I know with my friends-collectors is the case also.
Maybe all this practice still exists, but is held in secrecy?



qwerty вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Старый 24.01.2010, 17:57 Язык оригинала: Русский       #2
Гуру
 
Регистрация: 16.06.2008
Сообщений: 3,418
Спасибо: 2,915
Поблагодарили 5,168 раз(а) в 1,142 сообщениях
Репутация: 13013
По умолчанию

Perhaps the reason is exclusivity and scandalous. This was the last series of works in the life of a very famous and universally recognized artist, a cycle which he wrote in secret from everyone, including those from his wife. When his wife Wyeth saw it, she said: "If they did not like me, I would have just killed. Artist did not comment on the mysterious story of creation. Apparently, he just could not help it - he once mentioned that Helga symbolized his restless soul.
In such circumstances, the publication could bring a decent income, but only the sole owner of copyright, and provided that he would not allow premature leakage of information.



fross вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Старый 24.01.2010, 18:02 Язык оригинала: Русский       #3
Гуру
 
Регистрация: 29.08.2008
Адрес: Беларусь, Минск
Сообщений: 4,246
Спасибо: 2,696
Поблагодарили 2,434 раз(а) в 1,198 сообщениях
Репутация: 4331
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от qwerty Посмотреть сообщение
how many times I gave works from his collection to participate in exhibitions, including foreign, no one has ever even hinted about any money.
In fact, you do not have to pay as the artist or his descendants, unless the copyright is expired.

A foreign organization, it is likely themselves is covered by copyright agency.
__________________
В продаже произведения художников-эмигрантов из Российской Империи: Рафаил БИРЧАНСКИЙ (1883—1953), Иосеф БУДКО (1880—1940), Дмитрий БУШЕН (1893—1993), Пьер ДМИТРИЕНКО (1925—1974), Сэм ЦАРФИН/ЗАРФИН (1900—1975), Святослав МАЛЕВСКИЙ-МАЛЕВИЧ (1905—1973), Александра ПОВОРИНА (1888—1963), Рафаэль СОЙЕР (1899—1987), Анна СТАРИЦКАЯ (1908—1981), Владимир ТЕРЛИКОВСКИЙ (1873—1951), Карл ЧЕРНЯВСКИЙ (1900—1976).



Wladzislaw вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо Wladzislaw за это полезное сообщение:
Art-ort (24.01.2010)
Старый 24.01.2010, 18:19 Язык оригинала: Русский       #4
Гуру
 
Аватар для LCR
 
Регистрация: 29.04.2008
Адрес: Париж
Сообщений: 6,211
Спасибо: 18,677
Поблагодарили 38,262 раз(а) в 5,446 сообщениях
Репутация: 29882
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Wladzislaw Посмотреть сообщение
Actually, you do not have to pay as the artist or his descendants, if the copyright had not expired.
For reproduction of works paying copyright holder. qwerty said that the works were sold with copyright.

Frosya, history, in my opinion, is really more mysterious. The size of the sums obtained by the investor - the tenth case, and they look not so extravagant, given that Wyeth was one of the most expensive and most reproduced artists in the world. But why did he have in the 1990's. sell their avtoriskie right? In any case, not because of lack of money

qwerty on sales of works with assignation of copyright to individuals can not say anything. In theory - why not?
But Russia's museums, for example, in the case of purchase, and I think even give gifts to sign a document on the full assignment of copyright. Another thing - there are non-transferable rights (eg, the right route, which apparently is due to Wladzislaw, different from the tradeable rights to reproduce, to display, etc.).
We ought to take a closer look way more detail to this museum contracts, everything is there on a compass

On the other hand, the practice of providing paid work at the exhibition in the United States - a common occurrence. For example, when I met with the director of the museum Zimmerly (now seems to have the former), in 2006, he was interested only as dearly as possible to provide the items from the museum collection, the speed they did it - "on hire" their work to the museum that Johnson (or Jackson? not remember, but too lazy to search for directory) in Minneapolis.
You can also change the scale and talk about the Louvre in Abu Dhabi, which will also "remove" pieces of this, the French Louvre, just yesterday I read that this is a modest figure of 190,000,000 euros.




Последний раз редактировалось LCR; 24.01.2010 в 18:27.
LCR вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 3 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо LCR за это полезное сообщение:
artcol (24.01.2010), Glasha (24.03.2010), Tana (25.01.2010)
Старый 24.01.2010, 19:36 Язык оригинала: Русский       #5
Гуру
 
Регистрация: 16.06.2008
Сообщений: 3,418
Спасибо: 2,915
Поблагодарили 5,168 раз(а) в 1,142 сообщениях
Репутация: 13013
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от LCR Посмотреть сообщение
During the reproduction of works paying copyright holder. qwerty said that the works were sold with copyright.

Frosya, history, in my opinion, is really more mysterious. The size of the sums obtained by the investor - the tenth case, and they look not so extravagant, given that Wyeth was one of the most expensive and most reproduced artists in the world. But why did he have in the 1990's. sell their avtoriskie right? In any case, not because of lack of money
Certainly it was a prerequisite for buying the entire cycle as a whole, and this in my 247 works.

Added after 32 minutes
Well, it is, looking for information on prices for Wyeth in the mid 90's and find details of the transaction:
The buyer was the publisher of newsletters, bought the work in 1986 for 6mln. precisely because of their sexual scandal for some time before the Japanese thrashed the price of his watercolors to 1 million, Helga portraits appeared on the covers of Time and Newsweek, and in 1987 held an exhibition National Gallery in Washington that is very rarely carried out in their exhibitions of living artists, and the directory reproductions bestseller list, hence the price further and very quick sale.
For Wyatt's it all turned bad, the critics descended upon him with suspicion of being involved in this speculation. Not to mention the family welfare, which was also a serious blow. All subsequent exhibitions took place far quieter, and the artist had the wisdom and strength to continue their work in spite of ill-wishers.

Added after 34 minutes
Well, it is, looking for information on prices for Wyeth in the mid 90's and find details of the transaction:
The buyer was the publisher of newsletters, bought the work in 1986 for 6mln. precisely because of their sexual scandalous. Some time before the Japanese thrashed prices on watercolor Wyatt to a million, Helga portraits have appeared on the covers of Time and Newsweek, and in 1987 held an exhibition National Gallery in Washington that is very rarely carried out in their exhibitions of living artists, and catalog reproductions bestseller list, hence the price follow and very quick sale.
For Wyatt's it all turned bad, the critics descended upon him with suspicion of being involved in this speculation. Not to mention the family welfare, which was also a serious blow. All subsequent exhibitions took place far quieter, and the artist had the wisdom and strength to continue their work in spite of ill-wishers.




Последний раз редактировалось fross; 24.01.2010 в 20:11. Причина: Добавлено сообщение
fross вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 4 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо fross за это полезное сообщение:
ABC (24.01.2010), kozhinart (25.01.2010), LCR (24.01.2010), Tana (25.01.2010)
Ответ


Ваши права в разделе
Вы не можете создавать новые темы
Вы не можете отвечать в темах
Вы не можете прикреплять вложения
Вы не можете редактировать свои сообщения

BB коды Вкл.
Смайлы Вкл.
[IMG] код Вкл.
HTML код Выкл.

Быстрый переход

Похожие темы
Тема Автор Разделы Ответов Последние сообщения
True thing Бирюза Art Kaleidoscope 1 26.11.2009 16:28
So, it came true! Jasmin Exhibitions and events 0 30.07.2009 17:45
"True Briton" - Roman Abramovich immortalize in Krasnoyarsk Евгений Chatter 1 22.11.2008 15:54





Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 05:53.
Telegram - Обратная связь - Обработка персональных данных - Архив - Вверх


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Перевод: zCarot
Loading...