Conference in Munich - Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство

qwerty · 30.06.2009, 10:59

Last week in Munich, a conference of the International Confederation of Antiquaries and artdilerov. Nemereno people had gathered, was not only Asians and Africans, were discussing, of course, production problems, in general, agreed that the crisis experience, and the Art Market zadyshit full breast in the first place.
Among the materials distributed at this conference, I have generated interest forecast, prepared by internet resource www.arttactic.com. Its essence is that they give a prediction: what is the likelihood that a modern artist will remain a notable event in the market after 10 let.Pervaya dozen is as follows:

Gerhard Richter (91%),
Jeff Koons (82%),
Cindy Sherman (82%),
Robert Gober (64%),
Takashi Murakami (62%),
John Baldesari (58%),
Bill Viola (54%),
Maurizio Cattelan (53%),
Richard Prince (53%),
Andreas Gursky (47%).

Curiously, the "survival" Hirst was rated slightly higher than 30%, Franz Ackermann and Chapman - more than 8%, and George Condo - close to zero.

Vladimir · 30.06.2009, 11:32

Funny. Is it known rating questionnaire? Based on a survey of opinions of experts? They do not write on the site criterion forecast "survival".

Anything can happen. Is that Richter and some others were not in their company. These are people from another era, just still alive and may God give them health.

For panic over the survival of contemporary art is no particular reason. First, as shown by the crisis, experts predict anything intelligible can not (or vector or depth). Secondly, the "survival" - is ample room for interpretations. When it comes to the likelihood that battened down the prices will adjust downward in the long run, it is even possible.

qwerty · 30.06.2009, 12:03

"Survival" - a thing at all relative. In the same local Pinakothek in Munich, I met two very interesting artists, previously unknown to me - Oscar Schlemmer, and Heinrich Maria Davringhausen. I am sure that neither the one nor the other is not never met, either in museums or at auctions. Talked with the German antiquarian, first talk about "everything for us, the main man in the Bauhaus", the second did not know anything.
1 - Davringhausen, 1917, x. On canvas, 119,5 h148, 5 cm,
2-4 Schlemmer,
Number 3 is called "abstract figure,
Number 4 - "Gesture" 1922 \ 23, x., Oil, 200h130 see

Both do not lack talent, worked at one time, one remembers the other - no.

30.06.2009, 10:59	Язык оригинала: Русский #1
qwerty Гуру Регистрация: 16.04.2008 Сообщений: 1,213 Спасибо: 1,422 Поблагодарили 7,269 раз(а) в 947 сообщениях Репутация: 5499	Conference in Munich Last week in Munich, a conference of the International Confederation of Antiquaries and artdilerov. Nemereno people had gathered, was not only Asians and Africans, were discussing, of course, production problems, in general, agreed that the crisis experience, and the Art Market zadyshit full breast in the first place. Among the materials distributed at this conference, I have generated interest forecast, prepared by internet resource www.arttactic.com. Its essence is that they give a prediction: what is the likelihood that a modern artist will remain a notable event in the market after 10 let.Pervaya dozen is as follows: Gerhard Richter (91%), Jeff Koons (82%), Cindy Sherman (82%), Robert Gober (64%), Takashi Murakami (62%), John Baldesari (58%), Bill Viola (54%), Maurizio Cattelan (53%), Richard Prince (53%), Andreas Gursky (47%). Curiously, the "survival" Hirst was rated slightly higher than 30%, Franz Ackermann and Chapman - more than 8%, and George Condo - close to zero.

30.06.2009, 12:03	Язык оригинала: Русский #3
qwerty Гуру Регистрация: 16.04.2008 Сообщений: 1,213 Спасибо: 1,422 Поблагодарили 7,269 раз(а) в 947 сообщениях Репутация: 5499	"Survival" - a thing at all relative. In the same local Pinakothek in Munich, I met two very interesting artists, previously unknown to me - Oscar Schlemmer, and Heinrich Maria Davringhausen. I am sure that neither the one nor the other is not never met, either in museums or at auctions. Talked with the German antiquarian, first talk about "everything for us, the main man in the Bauhaus", the second did not know anything. 1 - Davringhausen, 1917, x. On canvas, 119,5 h148, 5 cm, 2-4 Schlemmer, Number 3 is called "abstract figure, Number 4 - "Gesture" 1922 \ 23, x., Oil, 200h130 see Both do not lack talent, worked at one time, one remembers the other - no. Миниатюры

Похожие темы
Тема	Автор	Разделы	Ответов	Последние сообщения
Conference "How to manage collections of works of art in times of crisis?"	LCR	Exhibitions and events	16	28.05.2009 12:00
Press conference home MacDougall	Ilona	In pictures	18	31.10.2008 21:40

30.06.2009, 11:32	Язык оригинала: Русский #2
Vladimir Гуру Регистрация: 20.03.2008 Сообщений: 8,085 Спасибо: 3,353 Поблагодарили 25,444 раз(а) в 5,540 сообщениях Записей в дневнике: 250 Репутация: 23525	Funny. Is it known rating questionnaire? Based on a survey of opinions of experts? They do not write on the site criterion forecast "survival". Anything can happen. Is that Richter and some others were not in their company. These are people from another era, just still alive and may God give them health. For panic over the survival of contemporary art is no particular reason. First, as shown by the crisis, experts predict anything intelligible can not (or vector or depth). Secondly, the "survival" - is ample room for interpretations. When it comes to the likelihood that battened down the prices will adjust downward in the long run, it is even possible.