|
Art Kaleidoscope Interesting and relevant information about art. Discuss general art issues and any topics not covered in other forums. It’s only about art — love, politics, sports, hobbies etc. are discussed in “Chatter”. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
Original language: Russian #1 |
Пользователь
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 44
Thanks: 20
Thanked 38 Times in 18 Posts
Reputation: 40
|
![]()
In the work of many human mysteries. The case of sudden illumination, a titanic work, the influence of other cultures do a variety of creative, endless and unpredictable. On the influence on art and artists of different spheres of mental activity, and conduct of the case I would like to talk in this topic. To start with Article V. Koshkin on the strange synchronicity of Physics and Art
Читать дальше...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Original language: Russian #2 |
Пользователь
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Москва
Posts: 90
Thanks: 13
Thanked 17 Times in 8 Posts
Reputation: 17
|
![]()
On this subject very well written S. Zweig in his book "Star Hours of mankind" (such as history of the Marseillaise), I recommend reading.
__________________
Цель личной выгоды у художника убивает всякое произведение искусства. Стендаль |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to natacha_m60 For This Useful Post: | mezon (24-05-2009) |
![]() |
Original language: Russian #3 | |
Пользователь
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 44
Thanks: 20
Thanked 38 Times in 18 Posts
Reputation: 40
|
![]()
Continuing the theme of the relationship of physics and art was revealed to me more depth of their relationship. I hope it will also help you in understanding the interaction of classical, contemporary art and people.
Читать дальше...
[color="# 666686"]Added after 3 hours 51 minutes[/color] Quote:
under the spell of a volatile spirit. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Original language: Russian #4 | |
Гуру
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,600
Thanks: 9,551
Thanked 3,679 Times in 1,689 Posts
Reputation: 6488
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to K-Maler For This Useful Post: |
![]() |
Original language: Russian #5 | |
Гуру
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Россия, СПб
Posts: 1,715
Thanks: 1,838
Thanked 3,879 Times in 698 Posts
Reputation: 7406
|
![]()
I think that the evolution of fine art is not influenced by physics and other sciences themselves, and their practical results. It is unlikely then the artist versed in the best physical description of the picture of the world such as the theory of relativity, quantum mechanics, etc. But the emergence of photography in the XIX century, in fact, deprive artists work "on the exact image of reality: the picture has done much more accurately than any artist. However, the impressions (impressions) from seen picture, then black and white, is able to transfer to a much lesser extent than painting. Hence - etyudnaya manner of the Impressionists, and their experiments with color (which had begun at Delacroix). Artist's keen eye noticed and perspective distortion of photographic images by comparison with visual perception (Gauguin expressed on this issue clearly, Cezanne - his paintings). Emergence in the early XX century, color photography, with its first imperfect color causing cravings for pure colors in the painting (eg, Vlaminck, Marquet, Dufy). Stereoscopic picture with unsurpassed realism (born almost simultaneously with the usual, but experienced a real boom at the turn of XIX - XX centuries, by the way, it was a great admirer of Leo Tolstoy) resulted in the desire of artists to "renounce the visibility, an image refracted through their consciousness of reality (futurism, cubism, surrealism), as well as non-objective painting. All this, of course, only a plausible hypothesis.
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Amateur For This Useful Post: | mezon (25-05-2009) |
![]() |
Original language: Russian #6 | |||
Пользователь
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 44
Thanks: 20
Thanked 38 Times in 18 Posts
Reputation: 40
|
![]() Quote:
![]() [color="# 666686"]Posted by 46 minutes[/color] Quote:
![]() [color="# 666686"]Posted 2 hours 14 minutes[/color] Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to mezon For This Useful Post: | SAH (28-05-2009) |
![]() |
Original language: Russian #7 |
Гуру
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,600
Thanks: 9,551
Thanked 3,679 Times in 1,689 Posts
Reputation: 6488
|
![]()
I see that Aristotle is not enough, then Heidegger: "... in the world is not about playing any single determinate being, but about playing the universal essence of things."
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Original language: Russian #8 |
Гуру
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Россия, СПб
Posts: 1,715
Thanks: 1,838
Thanked 3,879 Times in 698 Posts
Reputation: 7406
|
![]()
I did not want to go into the details of priorities. In this paper, E. Rutherford. "The Scattering of α and β Particles by Matter and the Structure of the Atom". //Philos. Mag., 1911, v. 21, p.669-688, it referred only to the kernel, open Rutherford in 1911, pro forma orbits of electrons as they say something vague and implicit. Boron supplement the model with circular orbits of the electrons (his work appeared in the first issue of that journal in 1913, but accepted for publication in 1912) and to substantiate its findings spectroscopy data. Therefore, the planetary model of the atom model, often called the Bohr-Rutherford. But in any case, if all this was the last word in physics. Hardly Burliuk read serious scientific journals, why ... How many artists does the reading now, for example, May issue of The Physical Review for 2009?
So whether syak there, but the question remains: how the artist could depict things that he could not even know? Or just a coincidence? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Original language: Russian #9 | |
Гуру
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: РФ, Самара
Posts: 75,397
Thanks: 27,867
Thanked 55,328 Times in 24,281 Posts
Blog Entries: 126
Reputation: 102388
|
![]() Quote:
Do you think that a coincidence? Perhaps ... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Кирилл Сызранский For This Useful Post: | Amateur (26-05-2009) |
![]() |
Original language: Russian #10 |
Пользователь
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 44
Thanks: 20
Thanked 38 Times in 18 Posts
Reputation: 40
|
![]()
We will not argue here about physics. But it is in physics, there are examples where the same idea came independently completely different people. Ideas of how to fly in the air. It's one thing when it happens between a science and profession. And if the ideas come at the same time, people of different aspirations, professions ... What could it mean?
|
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to mezon For This Useful Post: | SAH (28-05-2009) |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Degenerate Art? Art of degenerates! | Nedogonov | Art Kaleidoscope | 469 | 15-06-2015 09:22 |
Art Sets and kinetic art | LCR | Contemporary Art all over the world | 2 | 26-08-2011 09:46 |
The exhibition "Art about Art" in SRM, the Marble Palace | Mark | Exhibitions and events | 0 | 21-05-2009 07:34 |
|