NN Dubovskoy

[argonaft]

Help appreciate. Painting Dubovsky Nicholas Nikonorovicha "Sea Blue", 1911 Oil on canvas 75,5 x 107,2
Sorry, only such pictures.

[ВЯЧЕСЛАВ]

Сообщение от argonaft

painting Dubovsky Nicholas Nikonorovicha "blue sea"

From what he saw - the similarity with N. Dubovsky only in the plot.

[Konstantin]

argonaft you are in the base site statistics go?

[argonaft]

[color="# 666686"]Posted 40 minutes[/color]
VYACHESLAV, may be of poor quality pictures, but I assure you it Dubovskoy


-------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------

[color="# 666686"]Posted by 41 minutes[/color]
Konstantin, Thank Konstantin.Posmotrel, but I would like to hear the opinions of specialists and here.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 49 minutes[/color]
There is expert opinion.

[uriart]

What I had work Dubovsky, so if the signature is not standing on the front side, so stood back and print his own.
And the size of your work more than allows the author to leave his signature. How is this point guard.

[argonaft]

uriart, the back is a signature, just me at the moment no pictures.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 5 minutes[/color]
I'm certainly not special and in general is far from the topic, so to speak, but one thing is understood that many (I am not really mind the professionals), in the absence of expert opinion, they themselves become the experts and once boldly now attributed to the forgeries and copies.

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от VYACHESLAV

Based on what he saw - the similarity with N. Dubovsky only in the plot.

      Hundred percent, recognizable Dubovskoy! Nice picture.

[ВЯЧЕСЛАВ]

Сообщение от Tjutchev

one hundred percent, recognizable Dubovskoy! Nice picture.

And I do not doubt that you know how to read ......

[uriart]

It is a thankless business to assess and express their opinions about other people's work!

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от VYACHESLAV

And I did not doubt that you can read ......

    
If I understand you correctly, you ironiziruete about the fact that a message I posted after the examination has been shown at the picture. Believe me, I would not do it, if not confronted with the fact that the availability of expertise does not guarantee the authenticity of the art object (reality does not correspond to what is written in the examination). The credibility of an expert center depends not on whether they can be wrong or not but on how often they are wrong. Also useful to understand they do this deliberately or through ignorance of the object. I must say that in Russian major peer institutions operate is different and the level of knowledge and their ethical qualities of men. What can you do that is the reality. Proceeding from this, I found no harm in your comment.