Help rate

[ArtExpert]

A more precise - I interested in your arguments than paintings Ukrainian art revolutionaries better or worse, their creations aponentov.
I propose to do this by the example of these pictures of 4 different artists (two from each side):
from left to right: the first two - this is revolutionary.

[Феликс]

Сообщение от ArtExpert

A more precise - I interested in your arguments than paintings Ukrainian art revolutionaries better or worse, their creations aponentov.
I propose to do this by the example of these pictures of 4 different artists (two from each side):
from left to right: the first two - this is revolutionary.

The first two are not "pictures" and poluamatorskaya magazine chart. With Vlada Ralko compare them as ethically as a tricycle, for example, with the Porsche.

[ArtExpert]

Continue interesting

[color="# 666686"]Added after 5 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Felix

The first two are not "pictures" and poluamatorskaya magazine chart.

Guided by the data commented first Saladora Dali, Leonardo Da Vinci, Mondrian and Vazarelli, Ivan Marchuk can be attributed to the same - ie in poluamatorskuyu magazine schedule.

[Феликс]

Сообщение от ArtExpert

keep interesting

[color="# 666686"]Added after 5 minutes[/color]


Guided by the data commented first Saladora Dali, Leonardo Da Vinci, Mondrian and Vazarelli can be attributed to the same - ie in poluamatorskuyu magazine schedule.

Unfortunately, can not say anything. I-artekspert, not a psychiatrist.

[ArtExpert]

Continue interesting

[Yaya]

ArtExpert, Ilya Kabakov (with all its ambiguity) is very accurately observed: "The prices for the artist, in principle, are the result of market manipulation. It says nothing about the value of work. Elected by the very few characters in each generation, five - six, for various reasons - rarely works, the strangeness of the work. Not that this is necessarily a good artist. They are chosen by dealers on the basis of market. purely capitalist manipulation. How about this? As for life under capitalism in general. There are pluses, there are downsides.
I would say that the "strangeness" of the first two works, to put it mildly, does not excite

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Yaya

Ilya Kabakov (with all its ambiguity) very accurately observed

A further well noted Emilia Kabakov: should not be in it too much to believe, as believed, for example, Damien Hirst. He seems to be doing right, but it seemed to him that he had correctly played the market, that now can do everything. (c)
By the way:
http://dev.openspace.ru/art/names/details/3023/page2/

[Yaya]

Cyril Syzransky, thank you! but note, she said it a few days before the solo Hirst auction, the success of which does not believe it. Results solo auction you, Cyril, are known.
Would you like to work, which posted ArtExpert?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Yaya

Do you like the work, which posted ArtExpert?

And what and where?

[Yaya]

Cyril Syzransky, at the top