Burliuks-c

[Мира]

Hello, dear !
How many years - how many winters ...

Requesting : advise what to choose?
As a poor relative, bequeathed me one of these modest works.
Burliuk , in general, not my artist , so I have an interest in this case practical .
Both paintings , like, real and bought in ASA , both paper somewhere there .
Greek Goddess , I call it " Venus with claw " , and signed on the back there is a label picture . 13cm X 13cm
Landscape has not been signed and the label so dumb and Burliuk not very similar . Anyway, not typical , because my taste is prettier . Generally , Burliuk it? size 33cm X 44cm

I would appreciate any opinion.

Yes, both paintings are oil on canvas .

[Сашенька]

Perhaps the author of this message will be able to do anything to help mounting your:

[uriart]

World, none of the works does not seem to work Burliuk.

So do not be fooled.
Not his work

[Jane Doe]

Сообщение от World; 2938171"

Burliuk whether it ?

The first picture has no relation to DD Burliuk (1882-1967) , especially without a signature, which practically does not occur in Burliuk priori.

The second picture - a typical miniature D. Burliuk , which he churned out a lot and often . They do not always have been published and exhibited , as there were a no value or importance , and were simple household mini works .

[Мира]

Сообщение от Jane Doe

The first picture has no relation to DD Burliuk (1882-1967) , especially without a signature, which practically does not occur in Burliuk priori.

Totally agree with you , that does not look like and without signature not found .
 Today I passed kvitantsiyu.Okazyvaetsya that not ACA still existing gallery with which Burliuk had a contract , and the other on Long Aylonde , not far from his home . Surname of the buyer - the very distant relative , who died two weeks ago.
Maybe it's the artist's son wrote ...

Добавлено через 14 минут
And turnover receipts:

Добавлено через 10 часов 31 минуту
Wrote to the fund Burliuk (thanks Sasha !) , Send pictures and a receipt .

As suggested sold painting in '74 , Burliuk died in the 67th , a few years painting remained in the family. If an artist puts his signature before sending it to the gallery , it explains the absence of a signature ....

uriart, on your advice I will not deceive ourselves . But if you , like me , are curious , I will send you a response fund for drugs . (If coming )

[Jane Doe]

Сообщение от World; 2939461"

Maybe it's the artist's son wrote ...

At the most receipts indicated author's name - David Burliuk. When thinking about his son , it is not about David. He was engaged in painting , his hobby was wood carving .

Another son Nicholas ( Nikisha ) he painted worse, but also liked to put signature : N. D. Burliuk.

Сообщение от Jane Doe; 2938771"

D. Burliuk (1882-1967),

I did not just put in his report during the artist's life . This is to make clear what kind of Burliuk question.

It is no secret that in 1974 in the gallery Harbor Gallery an exhibition (Show) David Davidovich Burliuk work .
According to the receipt , this work took place under the number 13. And on this show , this painting was bought for $ 525 with a preliminary pledge $ 90 . And upon receipt describes the buyer's obligation to pay the balance before the end of the exhibition , gallery and promised to provide information about the location where the picture was written and mountains. So , this question has been raised there on the show.
Burliuk except signatures , often called the paintings depicted the country or place of action.

Unfortunately, we can not learn from what source this picture came to the exhibition. After David Davidovich died seven years before this exhibition, Maroussi also no longer alive.

As a gallery would know that an unsigned painting is the work of the Burliuk ? How it got there unsigned ? From whom? Or maybe just unfinished ? And he wrote his paintings in the studio on Long Island. Who brought it? Sons ? Why unsigned , when the whole studio , garage and basement were filled with lots of undisputed work ?
These questions do not find the confirmation. You can , of course , conduct technological research and identification of colors palette Burliuk 1947, but the meaning of what?
It is a pity , World, that your distant relatives chose this job and did not require galleries provide additional confirmation of authenticity. So, alas . We unleash this puzzle can not afford , all remain at a speculative demagogy.

Look closely at the back of the painting - the mountains and flat - building monochrome not like writing Burliuk older. Either they really unfinished , or someone did not know how to portray them . But they do not look at burlyukovskie characteristic mountains. Yes, and the sky behind .

Posobirali network nesolko images is a Mexican theme.
Can help with sravneii with this picture.

If you care about the memory of relatives and aesthetics of painting ( without interest commercial , so to speak ), then , of course, give yourself one that you no longer have to like.

[Мира]

Thank you, Jane Doe, that shared their knowledge and experience.

I did not know about the exhibition of 74th year.

The theme for me is getting exciting.

Google will go on to consider the Mexican mountains .....

[Solovlad]

Bushes.

Вложение 2219491

[Solovlad]

Sky.

Вложение 2219501

[Jane Doe]

Сообщение от Solovlad; 2940451"

Sky .

Yes , the sky.
Only it was not written DDBurlyuk sky . It just perelitsovka - unfinished red signature. I understand that this work is erroneously listed in the WikiRaintings of work and Burliuk , and works under Burliuk .
That's how the modern world of the Internet. Who thrusts there forgery subconsciously , and who , in pursuit of certain goals .

The picture shown above with the mountains and birch - a fake .