Aivazovsky?

[uriart]

Oil on canvas - 64h98 cm

Write that is attributed as Aivazovsky.

What do gameday in this regard?

[мистер-у]

My opinion is not Ayvazovskiy.S same plot but polutorometrovaya work was with us in the cabin, but the painting was better.

[Николай Левенко]

Сообщение от uriart; 2918061"

Write that is attributed as Aivazovsky .
What do gameday in this regard ?

Think it Aivazovsky . "Black Sea . Storm ." Last forty years, traces this lost, but she reappeared . In 1974, in his book " RUSSIAN PAINTING In Assembly of Czechoslovakia " by Vladimir Fiala wrote the following about this work : " Black Sea. Storm " , whereabouts unknown . There is color reproduction , published at " Farm" in the 1930s . By some accounts is the work that Yu Repin sent from Finland Prague merchant Stefanovich. Above postcard is attached.

[Артём]

Сообщение от Nikolai Levenko ; 2918251"

the last forty years, traces of this lost, but she reappeared . In 1974, in his book " RUSSIAN PAINTING In Assembly of Czechoslovakia " by Vladimir Fiala wrote the following about this work

Wonderful provenance to make a fake. The man with the help of modern technology imposes an accurate portrayal of the canvas and zero writes . But let what you do not know how to make greeting cards (pictures) in the beginning, mid-20th century ? It was quite arbitrary image . Here Aivazovsky painting "Rainbow" and this card ( photo 1,2). Well the difference is noticeable .)))
Besides, at overlaying picture postcard represented 100%coincidence, except signatures . And because the signature at a certain angle it is very difficult to put right. You can put a dab wrong and no one will notice , and your signature is required thoroughness , there will be an error and immediately visible and can be seen here it is . If we compare the mast of a ship that doubles signature , if we compare the signature that doubles ship ( photo 2 , 4 ), despite the fact that out , I repeat , is the same .

Сообщение от uriart; 2918061"

What do gameday in this regard ?

I think a good move with old postcards and pictures of lost , but you must know the technique and Ivan Aivazovsky , and many cards , let them think of other cards , such as ( photo 5 ) . Incidentally , cards must be stamped , otherwise the so-called Pictures, and not cards - http://www.playle.com/realphoto/photoall.php.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

About technique by copying the card will not be there , as you rightly said , even the technique of making this card it is necessary to take into account , but it did not quite understand :

Сообщение от Artem ; 2918861"

Incidentally , cards must be stamped , otherwise the so-called Pictures, and not cards - http://www.playle.com/realphoto/photoall.php.

shown on side [/URL] (" open" ) and written - open letter , hence the very name of these letters - card.

[Артём]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran ; 2918891"

also the technique of making the most cards should be taken into account

So that's the thing . Old postcard - it's not a picture, but here it just stripped .

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran ; 2918891"

that's not quite understand

Well that's another topic - philocarty. This systematize gatherers , with prized stamp cards, besides on it can authenticate . Ie profsleng - card or picture . But it does not matter , they do not look like a real painting.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Artem

Well that's another topic - philocarty. This systematize gatherers , with prized stamp cards, besides on it can authenticate . Ie profsleng - card or picture . But it does not matter , they do not look like a real painting .

Profslenga not know , but I know what card [/URL].

[Артём]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran

And what you call "stamp" on the card did not understand.

That is what gave the link above, one of the sites, which gives a list of the most famous stamps on the back of cards with information on estimated date of publication: http://www.playle.com/realphoto/photoall.php

[Николай Левенко]

Сообщение от Artem ; 2918861 "

You can put a dab wrong and no one will notice , and your signature is required thoroughness ,

Scrupulous needed at all, but better and does not take up a fake paintings by famous artists. Only a naive artist , who praised by flattery or by their narrow-mindedness in the field of painting , can imagined that he equated to the great , and it looks funny side . As for the cards , then I mentioned this postcard because it alluded to Vladimir Fiala . Incidentally, Aivazovsky more than anyone else not lucky with colored cards , most of them published in the series " Sh Copies Kartin Russkih GALLERIA" , which did not remotely resemble the original. For example, poor quality black and white card and a color copy . Check the method of superposition is not required.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Artem

So what gave the link above, one of the sites, which gives a list of the most famous stamps on the back of cards with information on estimated date of publication

And if there is no such stamp, but there output?