N /A France 18vek landscape. Prompt

[tunnel]

Hello!

Tell me the price

1.
N /A

2.
Oil on wood

3.
Size 32.8 x 50, 8

4.
Time to create 2nd half of the 18th century

5.
No signature

6.
Condition: talus, chipped corner

7.
Expert opinion - GRC Grabar.
Exp.
Makhotina, Kiseleva.


More details in the expert opinion

[John Preston]

Gentlemen,

Something I probably misunderstood.

Why "Grabar" issued on the conclusion of the notorious H?

At the request of the customer?

But are they simply "to put money," such-Makar ...

We had to return the work after oral consultation ...

[Toinen]

Сообщение от John Preston

Why "Grabar" issued at the conclusion of the notorious H?

The owner wanted to confirm (not oral) time writing, painting and country of origin.

[tunnel]

Сообщение от Toinen

Owner would confirm the time writing, painting and country of origin .

You are absolutely right , + still had a little hope to establish the author's work . In the old picture of the expert opinion was determined to holland art school , but one of the buyers, and probably a good connoisseur said , and suggested that this is France. He also said that the first expert report ( nobody Antiqua . Salon 90 ) at this picture - complete nonsense < - ~ 2 ~ ->

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от John Preston

Why "Grabar" issued at the conclusion of the notorious H?

Well, Grabar as if by n /x is not given custody?

[Art-ort]

Shakes titanic work of experts

[tunnel]

Сообщение от John Preston

Gentlemen,
Something I probably misunderstood .
Why " Grabar " issued on the conclusion of the notorious H ?
At the request of the customer?
But are they simply "to put money ," such- Makar ...
We had to return the work after oral consultation ...

They initially refused to do the work and was told that they could not guarantee the result. But none menie , I think they did a good job , perelapatili bunch of stuff . 2 months doing the examination.

[Toinen]

Сообщение от Art-ort

Shocking titanic work of experts

" every whim for your money !"
(C)

[Дилетант]

Сообщение от John Preston; 2311701"

Lord,
Something I probably misunderstood .
Why " Grabar " issued on the conclusion of the notorious H ?

And in my uneducated opinion - Makhotina completely fulfilled money paid by the client . Set the time to create and school, to reliably determine the specific nature of the picture of the beautiful original and its replica staging , etc, etc, etc.
In general, it seems to me A.Mahotina lady literate, well-educated , passionate, sincere , able to think logically, not lazy ("you gather the materials themselves , and that I have no time to hang around libraries - Business in bulk" ), not Tolstoguzov , and by age - not hidebound *. It is a pity that she quit. (Michael Matusovsky with Matthew Blanter just cried away in the left wings , the right word ...)
* ESLICHE : this - not advertising

[Art-ort]

Сообщение от tunnel

They all initially refused the job and was told that they could not guarantee the result. But none menie , I think they did a good job , perelapatili bunch of stuff . 2 months doing the examination .

I just see how they 're going to ... consultation and Kiseleva blinded the monitor sitting up after midnight , lapatila stuff ... sneezing from the dust in the archives ...