A painting of a man putting on socks

[mikhael]

Good day! A lot of time ago , I leafed through the album with reproductions . The album , in my opinion , contained Russian (Russian ) painting period - I am afraid to make a mistake - somewhere in the 1st quarter of the 20th century. I remember a picture. It was a picture ( medium-sized plan) naked man ( no panties ), socks, stringing , I think , standing near a chair or stool in the middle of the room. Tone was bright morning . Actually , the picture I remember his story " awkwardness " - usually still wear shorts first . I would like to know the name of the painting and its author. It was a good album, issued by a thick , ie artist must be a fairly well known . Thanks in advance for the help ! Sincerely, M.

PS. I tried the internet to find the collections of the " toes in the painting ," but did not find. Strange to say, collections ' stockings in the painting " is complete and the " sock in the painting "- no. Why this injustice - it is not clear ...

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от mikhael; 1994361"

Why this injustice - it is not clear ...

of sex ..
socks - men-only fetish .. and socks? in the first - male membership (often accompanied by a " smelly ") ...
A world of (mostly) the foundations and for men , and therefore " stockings basically" <! - ~ 1 ~ ->
 
second:

Сообщение от mikhael; 1994361"

picture of me remember the story of his " awkwardness " - usually still wear shorts , first

may be an error in the title : not " putting on " and " remove" ...
The editor (as always in a man's world) , man ( lady of such a blatant error would not doputili ), because a man with no pants and socks , ugly ( indigestible ladies ) show .. and besides, the story was born (probably ) due to a reprimand ... ( I assure you !)

[Игорь Гурьев]

Maybe Munch?

[Santa]

Сообщение от "NATA NOVA; 1995061 '

so that a man with no pants and socks, ugly (ladies indigestible) spectacle.

NATA NOVA, why are you such a categorical <! - ~ 1 ~ ->

Sometimes, it happens, and the eyes do not tear <! - ~ 1 ~ -> <! - ~ 5 ~ ->

[Pecheneg]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA; 1995061 ']so that a man with no pants and socks, ugly (indigestible ladies) show ..[/QUOTE]


[QUOTE="Santa; 1995801

why are you such a categorical

Sometimes, it happens, and the eyes do not tear

What do you ladies pereborchivye ..
<! - ~ 1 ~ -> Try to please you more ...

[Toinen]

Сообщение от Santa

Sometimes, it happens, and the eyes do not tear

Probably depends on what the lady drew attention in the first place.

[Santa]

Сообщение от Toinen

Probably depends on what the lady drew attention in the first place.

.. First and foremost, of course, on your toes <! - ~ 12 ~ ->

Everything else - again <! - 6 ~ ~ ->

[NATA NOVA]

Santa, Pecheneg, Toinen,
Here is the deal .. ( thin ) .. brain organization is very ralichaetsya ... (not worse , just different but better )!
sings and react in different ways ..
for example:
seated spectators ( experimental , with sensors iprovodami ), and the monitored response uchnye : Love scene in the bathroom .. The reactions of both sexes are the same, while in the field of view misses the toilet .. I half are female razky negative emotional .. (men , though henna , and women - all interest is lost, there is no orgasm .. ( figuratively, men - accessible emotional images )
(FROM try and research )
ps. Let us find the best - picture yesterday did not find ...
( all hope for experts )

[Toinen]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

Let's find a better picture

Why then, if -

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

lost interest, no orgasm .. (

                                           
?

[NATA NOVA]

Toinen, then again ilyustratsiya (the difference in brain activity)

typically male (samtsovaya) position: if there is an orgasm, then the source is not interested ...
M-MDA!
..
We arrived!