Three of the original painter. Kaudetzky?

[herrmails]

Pictures of cheap.
But I wonder more.
Is the artist so fond of writing a fowl house that gave out nearly three similar pictures?
Or is it all the time on one picture Kaudetzky and 3 different vendor "push" of 3 different "original"?
>

[uriart]

herrmails, the first and fourth pictures are the same.

The third difference is probably an option.

[Мимопроходил]

uriart, different pictures - compare as it is written (if you can call it that) the sky, a tree.
In general, poultry houses in the performance of Mr. Bogdan Kaudetzky often found at auction the second or third row, but in great demand not in use.
Even on a very small ibee hundreds ve often remain unsold.

[herrmails]

uriart, no picture on the other two do not like ! Take a closer look . What exactly do I in this case interesting is that whenever the original issue for all 3. But where is he? Or stupidity mayalsya artist , I'm sorry , painting the sky the other, then a peacock 's tail a different color , and the third even some unreal colors ...

[ISV]

After reading the posts of this topic, I remember the story of Georges Simenon, "The three of Rembrandt." Baseline data of course in the subject and the story is different, but here's the association I am having (somewhere I've heard), I thought and thought of "Three Rembrandt".
 
  >
 The hotel "Dryuo" was declared the auction, promising sensatsiyu.Rech was no more nor less than an unknown Rembrandt (it was a self-portrait). Some antiquarian named Val, long kept him at home, until he decided to sell. Exceptional value attached a picture not only signed, but the date-1669, the year of death hudozhnika.Drugogo portrait of those years did not exist.
 Some critics, who saw a masterpiece, recognized his genuine, but his word is not the expert said.

 Suddenly hotel filled exciting vest.V gallery "Dryuo" was well-dressed young man and gave the director on behalf of Val precious cloth. No sooner had the young man to leave, as he was replaced by a messenger, and handed the director parcel of the same size, had disappeared.
 Finally, in "Hotel Dryuo" Val was very dumbfounded and in front of the director, unpacked his picture.
 Before the director was not one but three identical Rembrandt. Commotion, immediately notified the police began the search for a young man, a messenger and in the confusion Rembrandt reshuffled so that it is now impossible to say has already been, where Val Rembrandt poor, and where not.
 The auction was postponed. Began debate on the authenticity of each frame rabot.Mneniya razdelilis.Na for convenience were glued labels 1,2,3.
Some experts defended the authenticity of the number 1, while others were for the number 2 and number 3 was at least zaschitnikov.Provodilis research expertise, but who out of 3 Rembrandt true, the Commission has failed to install.
 The auction was held still. Three portraits hung ryadom.Tseny auction was rabid. The funny thing is that the paintings were 3, but 2 of them no value predstavlyali.Auktsion looked more like a lottery, and to accurately capture a portrait, it was necessary for any money to buy all three raboty.Pokupka was made by an American collector, and cost him a fabulous summu.Teper web flaunt all three in his gallery.

 The mystery remains unsolved three by Rembrandt, but it was the fact that no real work, all three fakes.
 Our antiquarian Val decided to try his luck in one fell swoop and disrupt million.On fabricated by Rembrandt, more just three. Almost no one shows, except for one or two critics, is limited to conversations that once bought at some auction provincial dirty, grimy painting, something he vending, but after the Restoration saw that masterpiece in his hands, the dream his whole life and now that he has never not part with this kartinoy.Tak legend was born of a unique creation of Rembrandt's painting, which is not prodaetsya.Vremya, legend, and with it the picture, take on their lives.
 But suddenly Val announces his decision to sell a Rembrandt. Daughters should be given, and he clenched his teeth selling masterpiece.
 And what if the experts establish fraud? and here our Val, having at its disposal two more paintings, to the point that experts are not asked, "This picture is real?" and asked, "Which of these three really belongs to Rembrandt?"
 
 You know the end.

[herrmails]

> Thank you, it is interesting

[Konstantin]

Originally Posted by ISV

It is fabricated by Rembrandt, more precisely of three

Thanks for a good anecdote.
But still, as always in the details - like a factory?
Remake?
Then what's the problem, the chemistry just all show and experts from the art critics are not needed.

[ISV]

Following the announcement of Constantine, felt the need to emphasize again that this is just a story by J. Simenon in my retelling, which I remembered.
The story is not about pictures, not about the examination, but simply a detective story, has nothing in common with paintings hud.Kaudetzky >

[sergejnowo]

herrmails, not quite sure for what purpose, in the end , you are interested in this artist.
He does not have an artist in the broadest sense .
In short .
In Germany since the mid -19th , the 20th-century works were popular and medium-sized desk on " domestic fowl ".
There was a dozen artists who are "close" the gap on this subject , price and quality , from top to bottom . here a couple of typical works by artists of the "first wave ": http://www.liveinternet.ru/users/mar...post172272685/
The most popular and expensive was Carl I JUTZ (1838-1916). In the 20th century, the demand came and went in waves, but none of the new topic are not dug /opened . All were on the way up or on the grounds of the classics of the late 19th century. There were good kopisty - imitators (cost of works up to 1500 - 2000 euros ) were unimportant creators (the price of works 50 -200 euros). These creators , and is Bogdan KAUDETSKY (1898-1964).
All displayed work you do his work, went to the story he must have .
For example, a couple of works Carl I JUTZ (1838-1916), it is with them and write papers on the grounds .