Still Life with Fish

[I-V]

I ask you, dear forum users to share their thoughts on such a still-life:


Unknown artist.

X /m.
50 X 70 cm


Unfortunately, only have a photo.
Maybe someone can shed some light on at least a time and a school.
Thank you in advance.

[Ika-Ika]

Сообщение от Toinen; 1725811"

Dear IV, you can hardly say more than what you yourself know very well .

Why , we can say that this is cod to flounder , which are caught on our Severe.Tresku head in the store not to buy, I was looking for, so it does not specifically raised still life , a study written with natury.Znachit it is written somewhere fishermen because there are a bunch of mixed up , some pieces of paper , stones, ryba.Tak always fishing.

[Игорь Гурьев]

Painting, I must say, quite elegant, the color simply fascinating.

Traced some acquaintance with a painting of the early 20th century, at least if you take the dynamism of the composition.

[I-V]

Сообщение от Toinen; 1725811"

Dear IV, you can hardly say more than what you yourself know very well .

Do not tell me there seemed to be the first half of the twentieth century, namely the 20- ies.

Сообщение от Ika-Ika; 1725873"

Why , we can say that this is cod to flounder , which we are caught in the North .

Well, thank you , Ika-Ika - I was wondering something , what is this fish ? Indeed, very similar to cod ( typical bottom. Lip ). I did not know that flatfish species native to the North, and therefore thought that still life is probably the Black Sea or Caspian > I also think it is from nature, from the fishermen written.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от IV

I did not know that the flounder is found in the north

This is a set of fish and the Far East, not necessarily the North (the Barents and White seas).

[fabosch]

I do not know where really there comrade.
Guriev color spotted with this picture, but I somehow comes to mind is "severe style", although there are no arguments.
Thus, purely on impression.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от fabosch

but I somehow comes to mind is "severe style"

I would have dated the 60-70-E over the years.

Сообщение от fabosch

So, purely on impression.

Here I am on the impression.

But not the "first half of the twentieth century, namely the 20-ies."
there.

[I-V]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran ; 1726743"

Maybe so ?

Unfortunately , I can not see a thumbnail (the eternal problem , alas, on the forum) ...

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran ; 1726743"

Maybe so ?

Well, finally saw , after a 6:00 ! >

Cool is that you turned , of course > The color, however, is very far from the original came out. In my photo , though blurred , he passed quite accurately. Nevertheless , thank you. As for location , I have once again correct: there in the lower right corner there's a strong sign moth (later try to upload pictures) , which clearly is perhaps possible to distinguish a title K ...

However , the very composition of still life has involuntarily to such manipulations. For example , this watercolor Nicholas Kupreyanova ( with somewhat similar compositional principle) also wants to turn in all directions >

[Ika-Ika]

Сообщение от IV

also want to turn in all directions

This work must examine vertically.

[I-V]

Сообщение от Ika-Ika

This work must examine vertical

So?

Or so?
>