Aivazovsky to assess

[Илларион2011]

Dear appreciate danuyu kartinu.Vsem spasibo.Predlozhenie in PM.

[redbor]

'd Never thought it was Ivan Aivazovsky could well draw.

But against the securities with the seals do not trample, even though they are Ukrainian.

It remains only to multiply the square pattern on the cost of 1 square centimeter

(For works by Aivazovsky, it was like $ 1000?)

[Toinen]

redbor, in the expert opinion, (that of excise stamps for alcohol products) is written that the painting may belong to the artist studio I. Aivazovsky.

[Евгений]

Сообщение от "Illarion2011

Dear appreciate danuyu now

Probably nothing less than to "Russian Seasons" http://artinvestment.ru/galleries/ru....html?gl=435&m []=1076800 and the amount and time, almost one ..

[serg_str]

If you sell the painting in the Ukraine, then maybe this is also sufficient. Aivazovsky often counterfeited and full of confidence now must pass to a study somewhere else (Grabar, Russian Museum, Tretyakov Gallery, etc.).
Judging by the pictures, so absolute confidence in the authorship of Aivazovsky's not. I would like more information about the "sketchy preparatory drawings. Would look at the signature ...
Lead-zinc oxide in Aivazovsky extremely rare, as she Lugin wrote in his book "The technology and expertise paintings Ivan Aivazovsky.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Toinen; 1520691"

in the expert opinion, (that of excise stamps for alcohol products) is written

And in the conclusion of the National Museum. Ivan Aivazovsky written:

visual examination conducted on the submitted photograph of the painting (total hp front side before and after restoration) and macro sites with the inscription, signed and dated.

[redbor]

Сообщение от Toinen; 1520691"

in the expert opinion, (that of excise stamps for alcohol products) is written that the painting may belong to the artist studio Ivan Aivazovsky.

Or maybe not belong?
 Signed a Aivazovsky '. Dumb some of Kiev, this "expertise". Where such offer?
what have the Russian Museum.
In general - and other acts, for some reason, is not impressive.
Check "for lice" or what?

[Toinen]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

And in the conclusion of the National Museum. Ivan Aivazovsky written:

Quote:
A visual examination conducted on the submitted photograph of the painting (the general form of the front side before and after restoration) and macro sites with the inscription, signed and dated.

I'm shocked! Luckily, although the photographs conduct an examination, not by hearsay!

[redbor]

Сообщение от serg_str

Lead-zinc oxide in Aivazovsky extremely rare, as she Lugin wrote in his book" The technology and expertise of painting IKAyvazovsky ".

" of white pigments Painting IKAyvazovsky dominates white lead, are present in almost all works of the artist. There was no single case of use in the original paint layers of any other whitewash. "
 IMHO. Just check the reaction to such examination.
In CMC-though and write a wonderful review, but then themselves, and do not insist on fidelity judgments.
Therefore there is no signature, as usual - only Vakulenko.
Next - work on the bugs. That is, to assist the seller
" At the same time, some pigments are attributed to Ivan Aivazovsky, were not detected, it is - lead-zinc white, "

[Игорь Гурьев]

In my opinion, the picture is stylistically related to the late 19 th century.

Written as a tumble for Aivazovsky, some loosening of the composition (which is not peculiar to him).


What is Aivazovsky - I personally do not believe I can.