Is it possible to protect from vandalism?

[Konstantin]

Сообщение от SAH

if we take into account the above said we can easily see a serious and interesting topics to write post after that, talk is already becoming difficult oochen. Many in a private conversation that recognizes an obstacle for them to write just now, this raised my problem.

tandem

make a checkpoint with armed janitor test of IQ, to arrange a survey, "Who's the goat?" With drawing up lists of explicit or covert - this is the most shaped insulting

That's what I wrote when he said that there will be differences of opinion.

[Любознательный]

About reading.
1. Pay offline means the creation of a club (why not) instead of the forum with a high availability.
In this case, payment for entail liability for copyright attribution and evaluation (service consumer).
2. I agree that the forum - a place for socializing. Unfortunately, not always in the correct manner. I believe that you must include penalties for switching to the individual - it is sobering for many.
3. Respect to the restriction order "Pavilions" I can not agree. The most recent example - to send the "Duel". The forum participants discussed all key issues associated with the removal Luzhkov TO TV. After discussing the transfer, in fact, has nothing. It was interesting to watch the only plan which of the forum participants argued, repeated in the program.
In addition, we are real people.
Does anyone encroach on "Pets"?

[Маруся]

Сообщение от Lucy, 1313991

Flood also referred to messages from users in online forums and chat rooms, holding (in many cases) large volumes and do not carry any information or a very small amount of usefulinformation.

(Emphasis mine)
... Or the large number of messages (about 15,000) do not carry any information or a very small amount of useful information ...

Here is Cyril Syzransky immediately realized that for him it has nothing to do:
  

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

But I think that these participants correctly named Lucy - flooder.
Myself like an arbitrary contact-free, with jokes, rhymes, without them I see a forum a dry reference bureau, but only when these "liberties" to the place and in the case.

[Евгений]

Сообщение от Olga Ozolina

colleagues, as party to" Paul "continues his insults with impunity, I conclude that this site or no effective moderation, or a tone is normal. In any case, I do not belong here.
On EXP (and all other matters), please contact the trade union of artists will be happy to assist you.
Here me more can not appeal, I left this forum.
Sincerely,
Olga V. Ozolina,
Deputy Chairman of the Professional Union of Artists

Dear Konstantin, Elena, Vladimir, could you comment on this situation?

[Konstantin]

Yes noticed removed.
Paul warned, will continue to be rude undefended - the ban.
But he does not get used, however.
Yes we do.

[SAH]

Сообщение от Grigory; 1314641"

To my regret, stupidity, rudeness, talkativeness, and other bad traits are not the reason for the ban ... Alas ...

Perhaps all the same, it makes sense to introduce a moral and ethical control, suffer from it will not. Raise the bar stands.

Posted 4 hours 7 minutes

Сообщение от Lucy, 1332611

This is an outrage .. but if it could not respond

Today, what happens is that we are all slowly getting used to the low level of communication that is given by methodically vkraplivaniya in the topic. It must not be allowed, not responding to the banality, stupidity and ignorance, rudeness, we just roll down. Dulled eyes, ears weakens "the enemy" lull us comes in and steals from us.

Added after 7 minutes 34 minutes

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

I'm like a seasoned online Hedgehog fighter to say that there troll shallow, not numerous and maloplodovit.

That's great, better for him not to write horrible before you wrote a hundred times to think , re-read, to check on ethics, propriety. Before you know it already and do not troll and a useful member.

[zarajara]

I'm on the forum recently and slowly begin to learn its rules. I have after reading the topic you are prompted, perhaps, that once it has been, I'm sorry if you had not noticed.
What if, instead of zabanivaniya "to put in a corner" - to create something like a septic tank, where the Admin will remove the incorrect messages, so that they can be read, but, for example, could not be removed or quote.
 If you accumulate a certain number, say, conventionally 10-20 posts in a decanter, then all subsequent messages will be the author appears as on cigarettes at the color bar (that was immediately noticeable), something like "This author uses profanity".
I think it would be more effective than excommunicate the author, though it will be clear what the expressions are considered unacceptable in our forums.

[Konstantin]

Сообщение от zarajara; 1512861"

will understand exactly which expressions are considered unacceptable in our forums.

We tezhe morality that everywhere.
Unacceptable language, threats, padonkaff language, profanity.
It is strange that this should be a special way to sound, it remains only to provide a list of prohibited words and phrases, and then be sure someone will say that is not understood. How about some guidelines, "In the microwave drying pets allowed."

That's like someone in a useful message about the attribution of the painting, said painting by Rubens, so pererastak. This phrase is in the sump? Or the one who speaks the language of geeks, very upset that it has a tab?
And you will from that labels easier to read the dirtiest? And we become the infinite administration censors?
Just recently I made a comment the person who wrote without punctuation, capitalization and so on. Advised him to turn on the spell (there are options in the forum), he told me the answer: it is de way to express themselves and to another page of text about freedom of speech, and some kind of article of the constitution.
I told him that there is a constitutional right to the administration to ban hooligans (article really forgotten, but it certainly is), here I am this law and took advantage.

[SergeiSK]

Сообщение от zarajara; 1512861"

"This author uses profanity".

Intelligent people must swear, should be able to talk to him. Because it is a tradition of the great Russian language.
Rides the bus an intellectual, a number of hunky. Intellectual crossword puzzles. Asks his neighbor: "You can not tell - here here must guess some piece of three letters for the game in a horizontal position. Neighbor: "cue." Intellectual: "You have no chance eraser?"

[zarajara]

Сообщение от Konstantin

And you will from that labels easier to read the dirtiest? And we become the infinite administration censors?

The question is not "easier or disgusting." I, as a freshman, from time to time (sometimes accidentally) hit it in a dialogue where we are talking about the fact that someone was banned for nothing, someone is indignant, offended, someone believes that he is "nothing ...", the old-timers understand what it was about, but not all the same old-timers.
In no event shall not insist, you can see, once you do it.
 However, I note that if you are still something zabanivaete therefore - all are and the role of censors can not escape.