Artist Alexey Golovin

[Yurko]

.. Why just hopeless? how did the inventor of the lightning rod .. images on hundred dollar banknote ... divide it by a vertical line in 2 parts ... one of them, write down all the arguments in favor of painting by this artist .. but >

[Алексей Головин]

LCR,


Igor Guriev,
Painting in any case, in my opinion, should not be humorous. We need humor Draw caricature.
The pain is better to pass with a good script through film, instead of painting.
The audience reacts in a picture not only on prisudstvie humor and pain, but also to many others.
Semiradsky-genius, Makovsky, no.
He smiled at what you claim to people versed in the art.

U_Z,
picture, and still manage to get the correct color is not no
gives a complete picture of the painting.
Probably best to write and think, what I did, I agree. But did as I could.

Tjutchev,
aphorisms. I read fun!

Natasha,
I'm from the critics do not want to hang yourself ...
The wolf knows whom to eat, he eats and listens to no one
If the answer is quite easy, it is important for me in the picture of beauty.
What would be a terrible tragedy in the picture depicted the picture should be beautiful. And the beauty of the picture gives the composition.

Eugene,
Thanks for the parable. Turgenev was all very accurately remarked.

[Игорь Гурьев]

Yes they are both geniuses, just unfinished.
In Semiradsky as well rays play on the clothes and bodies, and look for similar women's faces - like to hang yourself.

Makovsky feared his bombast and sleaze, but even he compared to you is not sketchy, his figures are not out of polyvinyl chloride, as you have.

Lingering pathos - that's the worst thing in your paintings, especially portraits.

[Yurko]

And another funny nenravitsya? Try to draw a ... can anyone on the best way .. tell my specific examples

And if it is serious in painting many types and styles .. like around 300
and the estimated response depends on the time before this .. but it rastavit everything in its place .. that's what you Guriev, Igor painting prefer and what are they ready to give are not dry and cheeky comments as positive and qualitative assessment?

[Grigory]

[QUOTE=\\

[Yurko]

and it seemed to me a knowledge of the art business .. then yasnenko someone here is the strongest.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

See the theme of Safronov:
http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=89091

[Игорь Гурьев]

Good painting prefer.

Enumerate makes no sense that hundreds of artists of all time - from Duccio di Bouninsenya through Geertegena one-synth-Jans, Guardi, Bonington, Magpies Sapunov, Konchalovsky, and more.

But, please, here are some:

For example, A. Bazhbeuk Melikyan Geertgena that synth Jans, Caravaggio, Rubens, Jordaens, Rembrandt, Hals, Serebryakov, Dobuzhinsky, Benois, Somov, Robert Campin, Rogier van der Weyden, Van Eyck, Brueghel, Giorgio de Chirico, Giovanni Bellini, Gentile Bellini, Masaccio, Duccio, Giotto, Botticelli, Velázquez, Carreño de Miranda, Murillo, Zurbaran, Titian, Veronese, Giorgione, Tintoretto, El Greco, Poussin, Lorrain, Lenena (Louis and Mathieu), Georges de Latour, Larzhirera, Watteau , Guardi, Chardin, Vishnyakova, Levitsky, Khrutsky, Soroka, Venetsianov, Bonington, Purvita, Reynolds, Sylvester Shchedrin, A. Ivanova, K. Brullov, Repin, Levitan, Savrasov, Serov, Korovin, Anisfeld, Annenkov, Grabar, Baksheev. Tourjansky, Rylov, Sapunov, P. Kuznetsov, P. Utkin, V. Borisov-Musatov, Munch, Cezanne, Courbet, Monet, Manet, Sisley, Picasso, Braque, Matisse, Derain, Vlaminck, Dix, Pehshteyna, Konchalovsky. Mashkova Lentulov, Falk, Sinezubova, Krymov Osmerkin, S. Gerasimov, G. Rublev, Williams, Labasa, Luchishkina, Makkah, Vallotton, Pehshteyna, Beckman, Vermeer, de Hooha, Ruisdael (both), Siberehtsa de Hemov, Terborch , Kirchner, Schmidt-Rottluff, Cranach, Dürer, Holbein, Judith Leicester, Esaysa van de Velde, Jan van Huysum, Govert Flinck, Moiseenko, Salakhova, Popkov, Victor Ivanov, Stozharau, Victor Kharlova, D. Zhilinsky and hundreds of other three .

That's good.
As they say, do not make you a guru.

Geniuses, oddly enough, very much.
They were calculated by the thousands.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

[QUOTE=\\

[Yurko]